Philosophy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those interested in logical reasoning. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Zeno famously stated a number of paradoxes of space, time & motion to argue for parmenides unity & changelessness of being.

Infinite divisiblity of space & time seemed to be a commonly held view then (Aristotle distinguishes between infinite extent and infinite divisiblity), did anyone propose resolving his paradoxes by arguing against this?

I'm thinking of how Epicurus gave his atoms, indivisible matter further structure of minima which he proposed as an indivisible extent.

share|improve this question
If we want to be simple Aristotle did it. – Ivan Nov 17 '12 at 0:13

If they did, it wouldn't have helped.

As Robert Brumbaugh pointed out, Zeno constructed four different paradoxes: one that covers continuous time and discrete space, on that covers continuous space and discrete time, one that covers continuous time and space, and one that covers discrete time and space.

share|improve this answer
See also: – Niel de Beaudrap Sep 25 '12 at 12:54

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.