Kant's theoretical work Perpetual Peace could be seen as limited insofar as he didn't really provide any detailed thoughts on the legislative and executive institutions that would make international law reality. Could it be said that he relies on the enlightened and moral republican public to make up for this? Explain how this strategy could work, and whether you think its sufficient.
closed as not constructive by iphigenie, ChaosAndOrder, Joseph Weissman♦ Mar 19 at 3:10
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or specific expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, see the FAQ for guidance.