Take the 2-minute tour ×
Philosophy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those interested in logical reasoning. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A lucid answer to What makes a good question? quoted French philosopher Gilles Deleuze to the effect that a great thinker effectively lives her whole life within the boundaries of a single, great question.

This reminded me of a similar statement in an 2010 interview with Nassim Nicholas Taleb, where he insists that in his books (on problems of randomness, probability and uncertainty) he is always elaborating on one idea, that it takes maybe 30, 40, or 50 years to get and elaborate on only one such idea, and that this may occur late in life. In Taleb's books the same idea makes appearances e.g. in relation to different applications. (In the latest iteration it is called antifragility, an earlier term was convexity.)

Regarding the Deleuze quote (or summary) I am currently more interested in the part where he refers to boundaries of single, great questions, less so in dramatization and 'actualization' of the question. (The usual prejudices surrounding contemporary French philosophy may play a role here :) So with that, e.g. which article or book by Deleuze should I consult?

share|improve this question
    
My memory is imperfect, and I will try to track it down; I suspect it's in Difference and Repetition, though it might be in What is Philosophy? –  Joseph Weissman Dec 10 '12 at 15:06
    
VG, thank you. BTW, I would also be interested in the provenance of this fine illustration, if you don't mind. Re-thx in advance ... –  Drux Dec 10 '12 at 15:45
    
So that's a basic aerodynamic diagram of avian flight; I'm not sure where it was originally found, though similar images suggests this as a likely candidate: secretofflight.wordpress.com/birds –  Joseph Weissman Dec 10 '12 at 16:00
    
Ah, it's from a 1963 article. Thank you. –  Drux Dec 10 '12 at 16:50
    
This is definitely a paraphrase, by the way. –  Joseph Weissman Dec 10 '12 at 17:26

1 Answer 1

I'm now thinking this may be part of some commentary on Bergson's remark that "a philosopher worthy of the name has never said more than a single thing: and even then it is something he has tried to say, rather than actually said".

share|improve this answer
    
Great quote good one!! –  Myron Moses Jackson Jun 20 '13 at 3:09

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.