Philosophy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those interested in logical reasoning. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What variables can be measured to compare, for example, two different individual's conscious processing and interpretation of the same objective reality? For example, when terms like "distorted view of reality" are thrown around, how does one measure that or can conclude that?

How can we measure the differences in the processing and interpretation of reality between individuals and if it's impossible, please explain why it can not be done.

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

One could measure electric potentials / chemical concentrations in the nervous system. If experimenter shines a light on individual's eye and the amount of neural activity deviates from the average response distorted view of reality is detected - either blindness or hypersensitivity, depending on the sign of the deviation.

Update: details

There are many techniques for measuring activity of the nervous system that differ in accuracy, invasiveness, costs. The technologies may come from neurology or other medical fields, but are often applied in cognitive science, cognitive psychology and even bleed into linguistics (in study language acquisition and speech disorders). Cognitive neuroscience is ... concerned with the scientific study of biological substrates underlying cognition, with a specific focus on the neural substrates of mental processes.

  • Traditional technique - that you often see in fictional portrayals of truth detectors - is electroencephalography (EEG) which "measures voltage fluctuations resulting from ionic current flows within the neurons of the brain".

  • Many recent experiments are based on functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) "that measures brain activity by detecting associated changes in blood flow".

  • Positron Emission Tomography (PET) "produces a three-dimensional image or picture of functional processes in the body [via detecting] pairs of gamma rays emitted indirectly by a positron-emitting radionuclide (tracer), which is introduced into the body on a biologically active molecule". PET use for neuroimaging "is based on an assumption that areas of high radioactivity are associated with brain activity. What is actually measured indirectly is the flow of blood to different parts of the brain, which is, in general, believed to be correlated, and has been measured using the tracer oxygen-15".

There are also other - e.g. measuring electric potentials of individual neurons, optogenetics: making the neurons photosensitive and then shining lasers on them to switch them on and off (optogenetics isn't on its own useful for measuring "processing of reality", but could be used for testing hypotheses about it, I guess).

share|improve this answer
I did not know that, are there any references to studies like this? Is there a name for this type of test? – Greg McNulty Dec 20 '12 at 2:33
I've added some details – artm Dec 20 '12 at 8:07
this is awesome, thank you. – Greg McNulty Dec 23 '12 at 2:17

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.