The simple definition of karma that is given is: If you do good then you will get good in return and vice-versa. I'm not able to understand where would the effect come back from? Some says other people but who would be those other people? Is there a simple understandable logical explanation to this? I feel totally confused with understanding this which may sound simple.
That is not a Buddhist definition of karma. The Buddhist definition, put into similar terms, would be: you will reap the results of your actions, in this life or your next rebirth. To give a detailed explanation would require pulling in a lot of other Buddhist concepts and terminology; if you are actually interested in Buddhism, I would strongly recommend you check out a good introductory textbooks, like Rupert Gethin's Foundations of Buddhism or Peter Harvey's An Introduction To Buddhism, both of which are available in paperback and ebook form. If you are not interested in Buddhism, and want a superficial answer, I suppose the easiest way to understand karma is to view it as an extension of cause and effect. Buddhism has a particular notion of cause and effect known as "dependent origination" or "dependent co-arising"; karma is the dependent co-arising of doer and deed. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
First, I want to point out that there are very sectarian views on Karma. There are Buddhists who are of the opinion that "karma" is a mystical merit-system that accrues as one acts, and when one dies, their karma determines the circumstances of their rebirth. On the other hand, some Buddhists have very little tolerance for any notion of reincarnation in the traditional sense. In the most general sense, Michael Dorfman presented an excellent summary above. The word "karma" literally means "causality" or "the law of cause-and-effect." It is simply the recognition that our actions have consequences, and it is deeply related to the law of dependent origination. To give a particular view that I know to be common among Zen Buddhists and others, "karma" can be thought of as a symbol which captures a particular fact of psychology: that we often experience the world as a reflection of the way in which we treat the world (and vice-versa). It is a common (nearly to the point of vulgarity) truism that happy and kind people both experience the world as a happier and kinder place (for they are more likely to see happiness and kindness around them) and genuinely receive more happiness and kindness because others are infected by their goodness--and the reverse holds for anger and meanness. Many of us would label this phenomenon, in all its generality, "karma." EDIT: To specifically state where the effects would come from: the mind of the person who acts is the "source" of "karmic retribution/reward" in the particular view I've given. |
||||
|
|
|
In Buddhism Karma is the result of Intention (Chethana), Every thought we think intentionally (even doing something also needs Chethana in the mind, to accomplish it) will give us a good or bad result in the future (unless the person is a Enlightened being (Arhat)). Every thought has forms like Lobha(greed), Dosa(hate), Moha(delution), Alobha(non-greed), Adosa(non-hate), Amoha(non-delusion), or a mixture of them. First three forms will give us bad results (Akusala Vipaka) & latter three will give us good results (Kusala Vipaka). As I see its something like a energy in the mind. good thoughts will generate positive energy which will give good results in the future & so the bad thoughts will generate negative energy... Result will be varied according to the strength of the thought and the mixed forms of it (May be will not give any result in some cases, you may need to read further to understand different types of karma and Vipakas of them...). As we are not Enlightened we can get only very rough idea about the karma so we can not explain how it really works... As suggested in some other answers you can read original Buddhist scripts and try to understand it more clearly & deeply (If you are really interested....) Sorry about my bad English... But I guess you get the basic Idea :) |
||||
|
|
The verb root of (pali: kamma, skt: karma) is kr: do, make. As a noun: act, deed. Kamma is not the result, but kamma is an action that causes a result. In the suttas, the Buddha uses the term specifically to refer to actions that return results (fruit) to the doer. In the Buddhist context then, only by intending a result does one identify with and own kamma. This is a major distinction between Buddhist understanding of kamma versus Jainist in particular and most other religions (such as theistic speculations including soul and judgement). A Jain who steps on an ant, even if unintentionally, will expect negative karmic result, a burden upon his soul. The Buddha on the other hand denies the existence of a permanent continuous self/soul. A continuous self is an illusion created by ourselves by way of identifying with (sankhara, own-making) and linking various input (senses) and output (kamma). Only the intending creator receives the result of his intentional creation. Events occur without any need for a self to unify or identify with them. However, when we intend to unify and identify events (reinforcing a sense of self) the self image receives the result of the creation. If we step on an ant without intending harm, no harm will result. If we throw a ball of fire we burn our hand. If we become angry we are angry. |
|||||
|
Important note is that not just any (subjective) good, but actions that Buddha teach as good actions. These proper (or skillful) actions will give pleasant fruit. (Such as wholesome birth.)
Easy. More good actions you do, more good you are (for everybody who know you) and more good is around you. (1) Such that it's narutally more probably that you receive more positive feedback. (2) Good actions develop your mind qualities and skills, more developed your mind, better you at avoiding bad consequences. For example, wise you would not gamble, so no being upset from unfair losses. No dealing with criminals or bad "friends" - no woes from betrayal, etc. Not performing crime - no fears, no punishment. (3) More generally - good qualities is compatible with other good qualities and non-compatible with bad qualities (including bad karma results). (4) Good actions lead you into appropriate enviroment which "remembers" (in a sense) quality of your action. (5) It is also said that body with its sense organs is 'old karma'. And we know that mind is formative for body. So bad actions will modify mind in a way that it will modify the body. And wrong body (as sense-organs, and mind skills) is definitely suffering or will lead to it. (For exampel fool is almost certainly will create suffering for herself than wise.) |
|||
|
|
|
I do not know How Karma is perceived in Buddhism. But In Hinduism, the karma literally means action that one perfoms in all levels of mind,body and energy. To simply put it, it is like a software we write for ourselves. A wise man named sadhguru clearly says like this
|
|||||||
|