Philosophy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those interested in logical reasoning. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

When and how the study of naming objects began in philosophy? I mean how objects are named, how a same object can have different names refering to different aspects or features of the object.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Joseph Weissman Jan 24 at 16:00

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions on the definitions or semantics of words or phrases are off-topic here as they are already well-answered elsewhere. There are many fine dictionaries available on The Internet, and Wikipedia offers good introductions to most common schools of philosophy." – Joseph Weissman
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Do you mean ontology? – leancz Dec 31 '12 at 10:18
It would be helpful if you provided some examples. Are you sure that this isn't a question of linguistics? – Niel de Beaudrap Dec 31 '12 at 10:28
The act of naming objects is as old as language. The oldest (and therefore most relevant) artificial system of naming objects I can think of was "founded" by Theophrastus around 300 BCE. – SAHornickel Dec 31 '12 at 19:46
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The closest thing to the "study of naming objects" today, it seems, would be semiotics or semiology. As a sustained field of interest it has begun with Ferdinand de Saussure at the beginning of the 20th century. He convincingly and very influentially argued that language is a system of signs and that it does not pertain to "the world in itself" but is rather arbitrary.

Of course, Saussure had many predecessors interested in the very same question, but his posthumously published lectures were the main impetus behind turning this interest into a full blown discipline (which today one will find very far away from the original Saussurean conjectures).

In Cratylus, for example, Plato is already pondering whether the names of objects pertain to the "essence" of these objects or if they are simply arbitrary. Plato in this particular case is either on the essentialist side or takes no position. Aristotle, on the other hand, argued for conventionality of language: if a word had some sort of intrinsic connection to what it signifies why, then, even such basic concepts as bread and wine are called differently in different languages?

share|improve this answer

"How objects are named" is something of a mystery to me. I imagine it's been a puzzle since Adam and his garden full of animals for naming. So to speak.

For "how a same object can have different names referring to different aspects or features of an object", the most thorough treatment you'll find first is in Frege. If there are earlier mentions of this hydra, you'll find them there.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.