Philosophy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those interested in logical reasoning. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it possible to persuade a person into changing their ethical positions using logical reasoning only?

Let's say person A is an altruist and believes in "greatest good for greatest number of people", and person B is a misanthropist and doesn't care for other people. Is it possible for one of them to convince another, that their position is false, invalid, unsound, and should be changed? On what does this depend?

share|improve this question
Well, first off, a seasoned ethicist may object to what appears to be your utilitarian understanding of altruism. :) – danielm Jan 14 '13 at 10:34

The answer to this question depends on your position on the is-ought problem. David Hume argued that philosophy cannot logically deduce "ought" statements (statements of ethics) from "is" statements (statements of fact). Some philosophers disagree (see, e.g., Murray Rothbard's The Ethics of Liberty).

If you and your friend agree that there is no gap between is and ought, you should (in theory) be able to resolve your differences using deductive logic alone. If you think there is a gap, you can still use reason and evidence to evaluate the veracity and merits of the competing theories - just not in a way that's 'logically airtight'.

share|improve this answer

Greatest good for all is utilitarianism, not altruism.

Some psychologists would say it depends on the script they wrote for themselves in childhood. Everything they do and the people they surround themselves with is a way of validating their image of their role.

If the person is less sure about his guiding principles, he's going to be more resistant to change. The more uncertain someone is, the more they will defend their position.

One technique you could try is hypnotizing them to a regressive state and re-parenting them with better strategies. Not sure we're supposed to know that if we don't have ph.D's in clinical psychology or something.

Books you might like:

Persuasive Technology BJ Frog

Games People Play

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.