Epistemology is the study of knowledge, acquisition thereof, and the justification of belief in a given claim.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

5
votes
3answers
79 views

What is the relationship between qualia and the fact/value dichotomy

Has anyone examined the relationship between qualia and the fact/value dichotomy? Consider a functional description of pain: Those who disagree with functionalism, typically do so because it leaves ...
1
vote
2answers
93 views

Occam's razor and believing that the world is flat

Suppose I'm a inland, rural, tropical farmer who spend my life in one place tending to my farm without education in astronomy. Then someone comes along and tells me that the earth is round. All the "...
5
votes
6answers
145 views

If everything is theory laden, how can one argue against climate change deniers?

Per Quine's results from "Two Dogmas of Empiricism", the Duhem-Quine thesis, and later results such as those of Kuhn and Feyerabend, all empirical observations are theory laden. Even widely accepted ...
1
vote
0answers
44 views

Just what is it that makes todays theoretical posits so different, so appealing?

... from those of yester-years, or yester-millenias? Westerhoff, writes in his transaltion of the Nagarjunas Madhyamakarika (Verses on the Middle Way) that: The idea of fire-atoms as ultimately ...
2
votes
1answer
24 views

Does Coherentism lead to relativism?

Source: p 273 Top, Introducing Philosophy for Canadians: A Text with Integrated Readings (2011 1 ed). Primary Source: 'Could Truth Be Coherence with a System of Beliefs?' by Uni. of Victoria Prof. ...
2
votes
1answer
45 views

How do Coherentists rebut the argument that Coherence Theory allows patent falsehoods to be true?

Source: p 272 Bottom-273 Top, Introducing Philosophy for Canadians: A Text with Integrated Readings (2011 1 ed). Primary Source: 'Could Truth Be Coherence with a System of Beliefs?' by Uni. of ...
0
votes
1answer
31 views

When taking the axiomatic approach to the Munchausen Trilemma, how do you know something is an axiom?

One answer to the Munchausen Trilemma is the axiomatic approach. This ends the endless "how do you know?"s by simply saying "I accept this as true". But how do you know you accept that is true? If you ...
3
votes
2answers
137 views

can we know whether the self-referential statement: “It's not possible to deduce whether P1 is true or false” is undecidable?

Update: Simple concise version Thanks to Nick R for pointing in the right direction. The statement P0: "this statement is false" is undecidable. The statement P1: "this statement is undecidable" is ...
0
votes
2answers
64 views

What if the Accompanying Voice is internal and non-mystical, yet mistakenly is the basis for Religion? [closed]

Some small proportion of people (you know who you are) have an Accompanying Voice: an equal who converses with your "normal thought voice" whenever you have questions or problems that you cannot solve,...
1
vote
2answers
56 views

'My cat is on the mat.' vs 'There is an animal in my house.'

Source: p 268 Middle, Introducing Philosophy for Canadians: A Text with Integrated Readings (2011 1 ed).   Second, the theory doesn't satisfactorily explain what true beliefs correspond to. With ...
1
vote
2answers
95 views

Why are negative facts more 'shadowy' than positive facts?

Source: p 268 Middle, Introducing Philosophy for Canadians: A Text with Integrated Readings (2011 1 ed).   Second, the theory doesn't satisfactorily explain what true beliefs correspond to. With ...
1
vote
2answers
53 views

Are language, context and truth connected?

I have been thinking about the following problem for years and can't seem to resolve it. I'm looking for more information on the subject and would really appreciate some further reading on the ...
2
votes
0answers
40 views

Unity of Apperception vs. Self Consciousness in Critique of Pure Reason

What is the difference between Unity of Apperception and Self- consciousness? From what I gather so far, Unity of Apperception is a particular part of Self-Consciousness in that UoA brings to ...
0
votes
3answers
81 views

If you can always ask “How do you know that”, how can you know anything?

For any statement, you can always ask "how do you know?". Even if you give an answer, how do you know that answer is true? Let me give an example. Take the statement 'I think, therefore I am'. How do ...
2
votes
0answers
23 views

How is Descartes Sure of Things When He is “Attending” to Them?

On SparkNotes, Rene Descartes apparently knows some things to be true as long as he is "attending" to them. These clear and distinct perceptions are only indubitable so long as he is attending to ...
2
votes
1answer
51 views

What are some example of properly basic beliefs being incorrigible and how can incorrigible beliefs be justified?

I was reading that properly basic beliefs are beliefs that are either self-evidently true, evident to the senses or incorrigible. The general example given for incorrigible beliefs is "beliefs I ...
2
votes
3answers
120 views

How do we know we believe things?

This is my first philosophy question, so please bear with me. Wikipedia says belief is Belief is the state of mind in which a person thinks something to be the case, with or without there being ...
2
votes
0answers
52 views

Hypothesis and thesis

Hypothesis means several things, but I think (and Wikipedia roughly agrees) that there are two main senses: A. Epistemological - a tentative affirmation, posed as explanation for a phenomenon. In the ...
-6
votes
1answer
50 views

After everything dies and nothing exists, is the universe back to where it started? [closed]

Self explanatory. After everything is dead and nonexistent, is the universe in the same state that it started from?
2
votes
0answers
76 views

A critique of the epistemoloical models of religion

I'm interested to find any existing critique of the epistemological models by which religions (especially the various branches of Christianity) determine their theological conclusions. What I ...
-4
votes
1answer
38 views

What *objective* criteria can be used to judge philosophical refutations?

What objective criteria can be used to judge philosophical refutations? Say for example that someone is writing a criticism of Karl Popper. What are ways to reject the criticism without getting into ...
1
vote
1answer
61 views

Can kantian categories only be applicated to objects given by the senses?

The question is inspired by the comments of this answer by @PédeLeão and I think it deserves a question of its own to have room for clarifying this. Possible candidates Kant, in German, has pretty (...
0
votes
1answer
40 views

Epistemology of derealization

I'm wondering if anyone has analyzed derealization from an epistemological perspective. If one person perceives the world as real and another perceives it as unreal, are we justified in viewing the ...
1
vote
3answers
69 views

Can more than 2 things be in direct opposition?

What I mean by this, is something which is exactly opposite to say both positive and negative, just as much as the two are in opposition to each other. This idea arose and evolved when I was thinking ...
2
votes
0answers
78 views

Can anything be truer than true?

The Wikipedia page of Philosophy of Science says, "This discipline overlaps with metaphysics, ontology, and epistemology, for example, when it explores the relationship between science and truth such ...
3
votes
2answers
78 views

Does Quine consider the Homeric gods to have predictive power?

Quine wrote in his 1951 paper "Two Dogmas of Empiricism": "Physical objects are conceptually imported into the situation as convenient intermediaries not by definition in terms of experience, ...
1
vote
0answers
50 views

Hypothetically observable

Question: When is it appropriate to assign the property "hypothetically observable" to a thing? The set up is that someone is discussing an object that they claim has some sort of existence. Maybe ...
2
votes
1answer
54 views

What are factual propositions?

I've been reading up on epistemology, after having studied a bit of logic. Given that, I am in a good (or at least better) position to understand a proposition, and it's properties. One such property ...
1
vote
2answers
58 views

To Check or not to Check? [closed]

Samuel and Paul make a wager. They want to know if a certain professor held class the day prior when they were absent. The professor is unreachable, though, so they have to ask students from class. If ...
2
votes
3answers
135 views

How to prove that what we will know isn't true isn't true?

My apologies for the convoluted question. I'm still (kinda) arguing with someone that if we have knowledge then there are facts. One way I've argued for this, is by saying that what we will know isn'...
0
votes
1answer
25 views

Where can I go to find one-on-one verbal Philosophical discussion?

I don't know if method questions are as allowable as content questions, but I am seeking conversational partners to riff on and analyze ideas with as I wend through philosophical inquiries. Because I ...
5
votes
2answers
117 views

Have any philosophers applied the concept of “underdetermination” to non-scientific contexts?

Most resources I've found on underdetermination approach the subject within the context of science. That's definitely a fascinating area of study, but I'd like to explore ways of applying ...
3
votes
1answer
37 views

Did Gettier's paper have an impact outside epistemology?

Edmund Gettier's paper refuting the Justified True Belief (JTB) account of knowledge has been described as 'landmark' and 'legendary'. I more or less understand how it proved, using counterexamples, ...
3
votes
1answer
64 views

Philosophy of beauty / Science

I have been thinking about the idea of science and its rightful activity conveying beauty. I got this idea from a quote from Richard P. Feynman which I attach it in the end of my question for ...
1
vote
1answer
56 views

Why is this argument against solipsism and skepticism bad, unless reality can be defined as what we can observe?

Source: pp 15-16, What Does It All Mean? A Very Short Introduction to Philosophy (1987) by Prof. Thomas Nagel. Sorry for the long quote; please advise me if and how I can shorten it.   There is ...
3
votes
2answers
74 views

What happens when something becomes familiar to us?

Lately I've been pre-ocuppied with this question, which frankly makes me look at my surroundings in a fresh way. (I am mainly concerned with objects at the moment, but I think there can be a lot of ...
2
votes
2answers
34 views

What did Thomas Nagel intend to distinguish, in distinguishing 'impression' vs 'perception of reality'?

Source: pp 15-16, What Does It All Mean? A Very Short Introduction to Philosophy (1987) by Prof. Thomas Nagel  According to this view, the idea of a dream from which you can never wake up is not ...
1
vote
0answers
6 views

Is it possible to adopt the interpretivism philosophy of science when conducting a deductive study?

The philosophy of interpretivism is often associated with inductive studies. Is it considered too huge of a mismatch to adopt this philosophy for a qualitative deductive study? If so, what are the ...
8
votes
3answers
922 views

What's the current status of the “paradox of analysis”? And are there any strong and widely accepted resolutions?

It would seem that figuring out a solution to the paradox of analysis would be of prime importance to philosophers, especially considering the fact that conceptual analysis seems central to ...
2
votes
2answers
94 views

Are all self-evident truths necessarily redundant?

Every justificationist theory of knowledge has axioms and premises that it begins with. This fact has led skeptics to criticize the possibility of knowledge by noting the infinite regress within any ...
10
votes
3answers
154 views

Is Feyerabend confusing discovery and justification when he criticizes the scientific method?

I am reading Feyerabend's "Against Method", where he uses Copernicus's (and Galileo's confirmation) discovery of the fact that the Earth orbits around the Sun and other examples to show that ...
7
votes
2answers
125 views

How should one properly characterize mathematical conclusions?

I am a mathematics graduate student, not a philosophy student, so please bear with me. However, I am interested in investigating what exactly it is that I spend the majority of my week doing! As ...
4
votes
5answers
152 views

Is this a legitimate solution to the brain in a vat problem?

The problem: "Since the brain in a vat gives and receives exactly the same impulses as it would if it were in a skull, and since these are its only way of interacting with its environment, then it is ...
2
votes
1answer
80 views

Are Nontransitive Dice a problem for probability interpretations?

A set of dice is nontransitive if the binary relation – X rolls a higher number than Y more than half the time – on its elements is not transitive. Different sets of such dice are known. 'Rolling ...
8
votes
2answers
109 views

In what fundamental ways, if any, does Husserl break with Kant?

I've read only slim secondary works on Husserl some time ago, and recently started "The Crisis in the European Sciences." So far, the framework seems faithfully Kantian. Husserl, for example, ...
3
votes
4answers
291 views

Question of Identity

Conversing with someone trying to convince me that 2 and 1+1 are not the same thing. His argument was that although 1+1 = 2, they are in fact different because the notation is different. We see "1+1" ...
4
votes
1answer
81 views

If it's impossible to separate science from metaphysics, is it is also impossible to separate science from ethics and values?

One of the most important results in philosophy of science is that every observation is "theory-laden", i.e. that the outcome of any scientific experiment is affected by the theoretical ...
5
votes
1answer
99 views

What is the difference between everyday realism and metaphysical realism?

At an everyday level, we seem to subscribe to a from of strong realism which doesn't leave any room for skepticism. We are certain that individuals who hear voices in their heads or who have ...
6
votes
1answer
115 views

How does a realist account for causation between universals and particulars?

With respect to universals nominalists maintain that there are no universals and only particulars exists. Conversely, realists says that there are universals. Here is a sketch of an argument against ...
6
votes
1answer
143 views

How do psychoanalysts interpret the epistemological concept of “proof”?

How do psychoanalysts interpret the epistemological concept of "proof"? Not necessarily of psychoanalysis.