Knowledge is a familiarity with someone or something, which can include facts, information, descriptions, or skills acquired through experience or education.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

1
vote
0answers
48 views

Hypothetically observable

Question: When is it appropriate to assign the property "hypothetically observable" to a thing? The set up is that someone is discussing an object that they claim has some sort of existence. Maybe ...
3
votes
1answer
47 views

What is the relation between 'knowledge-that' and 'knowledge-how' under pragmatism?

Quick bit of definitions for the words: Knowledge-that is knowledge that answers a question about a thing. It is informative of a thing's nature or kind. Knowledge-how is knowledge that is expressed ...
1
vote
0answers
22 views

Knowledge is a limitation

What does it mean to be constrained by Epistemology? Can I "know" something without actually experiencing it? If I am but one person do I in fact know anything? Let me provide specificity to the ...
2
votes
2answers
34 views

for Descartes, God is guarantee of truth, why do i make mistakes?

Descartes uses intellect to prove that God is the guarantee of the truth, and disproving the evil demon. But if this is true, why when i make purely intellectual reasoning, (because i can make a ...
0
votes
0answers
21 views

Is there a term for surface knowledge being equivalent to a deeper understanding?

What I'm talking about is sort of two things. When this is empirically the case, such as a blackhole's measure of information being related to its surface area, instead of its volume When this is ...
8
votes
2answers
107 views

In what fundamental ways, if any, does Husserl break with Kant?

I've read only slim secondary works on Husserl some time ago, and recently started "The Crisis in the European Sciences." So far, the framework seems faithfully Kantian. Husserl, for example, ...
6
votes
1answer
114 views

How does a realist account for causation between universals and particulars?

With respect to universals nominalists maintain that there are no universals and only particulars exists. Conversely, realists says that there are universals. Here is a sketch of an argument against ...
5
votes
5answers
145 views

What does it mean to know something?

Humans know trees. So do squirrels. Even though their mental concept of "tree" may be very different, I think we can agree that lots of animals recognise trees and have some sort of understanding of ...
1
vote
1answer
40 views

Law of Contrapositives?

The Law of Contrapositives states that if a conditional statement is true, then it's contrapositive will also be true. I can easily see this works through example conditional statements, but why does ...
2
votes
1answer
20 views

Example of knowledge representation as a surrogate for something in the world

I've been trying to learn about knowledge representations. According to a canonical definition, a knowledge representation is: a surrogate for real-world entities an ontological commitment ...
1
vote
1answer
17 views

Where can I find a correlation to Russell's epistemology in the Tractatus?

According to the Structure of the Tractatus, there is: 1) the ontology at the beginning; 2) "a discussion to what Russell calls epistemology, but it is actually the foundation of possible knowledge ...
1
vote
2answers
39 views

Is the concept of “fact” useful?

In an answer to my question concerning facts about the past, it was stated: "We can never be certain that any given statement is true so we can never be certain of the facts of whatever matter we are ...
5
votes
2answers
76 views

Can a statement about the past be a 'fact'?

There was an annular solar eclipse near where I used to live (about 20 years ago). It is pretty well certain that it did happen, because eclipses can be reckoned precisely and the likelihood of ...
2
votes
4answers
123 views

Can a statement about the future be a 'fact'?

I am told that there will be a solar eclipse where I live next year. It is pretty well certain that it is going to happen, because eclipses can be reckoned precisely and the likelihood of anything ...
2
votes
3answers
71 views

Is all knowledge dependent on culture?

Is all knowledge dependent on culture? how to define knowledge to our own perspective? if we don't exist does the knowledge disappear?
1
vote
2answers
45 views

What do we know absolutely? [closed]

A frequent "starter question" for Self Inquiry is: "What do you know for sure?" How would Philosophy state, without question, what we can and do know? I don't mean everything that we know, I mean, ...
6
votes
4answers
190 views

Why is “the problem of criterion” problematic?

If I understand it correctly, the problem of criterion is essentially that you can only identify knowledge if you have the criteria for knowledge, but that you can only have the criteria for knowledge ...
2
votes
3answers
90 views

Is “Truth” something like a Dirac Delta Function?

To me, Truth is simply what is the case. It is not a matter of reasoning, and it could not be otherwise. Knowledge is a set of beliefs which accord with reality (what is true). Beliefs can be false. ...
1
vote
4answers
92 views

Is Philosophy “After The Fact” knowledge? [closed]

A professor once told me that there is no way to distinguish what is true and what is false in our knowledge except to "see what happens." This seems to imply that the only true knowledge is knowledge ...
0
votes
5answers
96 views

What kind of knowledge can be gathered without testing hypotheses?

Question What is the set of conditions under which a given knowledge can or cannot be acquired without testing (statistics) hypotheses? Thoughts on different fields Below is a list and definitions (...
0
votes
4answers
133 views

Can one pursue knowledge without their own personal perspective?

In my opinion, the pursuit of knowledge is directly linked the the individual pursuing it, and their perspective is crucial in the process. However, would anyone have an argument to why an individual ...
1
vote
2answers
36 views

IF knowledge were justified true belief, then would innate knowledge be impossible?

I realize that the JTB theory of knowledge has problems, but IF it were true, then innate knowledge would be impossible, right? This seems to follow from the 'justified' portion of JTB: justification ...
5
votes
2answers
166 views

Did Kant come to believe that we have access to things-in-themselves after all?

Kant's position on things-in-themselves is often described Socratically, of them we know only one thing, that they are. However, in an old but apparently still popular history of philosophy book I ...
0
votes
0answers
56 views

'God exists and does not deceive us': Why is this necessary for memory of proofs?

Source: p 38, Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy (1 ed, 1999) by Simon Blackburn Caution: I modified Blackburn's syntax and organisation to ameliorate readability; I added all numbering. ...
3
votes
0answers
86 views

Suffering, the sacred, and the sublime: what should science make of the third kind of knowledge?

Ryle and Wittgenstein carved out knowledge-how (craft) as irreducible to the traditional propositional knowledge, Ryle gave accepting the irreducibility the scary name of anti-intellectualism. SEP ...
11
votes
1answer
183 views

How did Kant define knowledge?

A recent question about the Plato's formula K=JTB (knowledge is justified true belief) made me curious as to what Kant thought on the matter. In the prefaces and the Introduction to the first Critique ...
4
votes
1answer
117 views

Was Socrates of the belief that knowledge was attainable after death?

I've begun reading The Phaedo, wherein Socrates argues against the case of suicide. He begins by assuming that since we as men are possessions of the gods, they would be angered were one of their ...
1
vote
2answers
85 views

How is knowledge most commonly defined today?

Maybe you will say justified true belief, but some claim that it doesn't account for Gettier's, so: is there a better definition which is becoming more prominent today? Or can the JTB, perhaps with ...
6
votes
3answers
202 views

How does Husserl's “bracketing” secure a truly presuppositionless study?

I'm reading from an anthology of essays by and about Husserl (collected by Joseph Kockelmans): More specifically, Husserl makes a strong argument against some of the internal problems of various ...
16
votes
2answers
778 views

Are there any philosophers that argued for knowledge having intrinsic value?

Many (if not most) philosophers agree that knowledge has value. However, does it have intrinsic value, or is its value purely in its ability to affect things outside of the realm of knowledge? Are ...
5
votes
1answer
99 views

What is Wittgenstein's “criterial solution” to the problem of other minds?

I'm having difficulty with the language in this article on the Problem of Other Minds. It provides 3 solutions to the epistemological problem of other minds in section 1.1 - "The Epistemological ...
3
votes
1answer
63 views

Relationship between intelligence, thinking and knowledge [closed]

A quick google search defines intelligence as "the ability to acquire and apply knowledge" and thinking as "the process of considering or reasoning about something" What is the relationship between ...
6
votes
2answers
77 views

Why does Russell prohibit judgments based on knowledge by description?

I'm new to philosophy and have picked up Bertrand Russell's 'The Problems of Philosophy'. I have a question relating to the end of the chapter on 'Acquaintance and Description'. Russell states that we ...
3
votes
2answers
107 views

Do philosophical theories stay independent of scientific discoveries?

I asked a question earlier about how the Genealogy of Morals by Nietzsche had held out in terms how accurate his philosophy was, now that we know more about the emergence of the human animal. The ...
3
votes
3answers
142 views

If there is a difference between a priori knowledge and innate knowledge, what is it?

A priori knowledge is knowledge before or despite experience. But as such, does this not either mean or at least entail innate knowledge?
4
votes
3answers
87 views

Definitions of: Fact, Theory, Hypothesis, Evidence and prediction [closed]

Motivations I recently answered to this question on Biology.SE. The question asks: Is evolution a fact? Is it true that human and chimpanzee evolved from ape? In my answer I started with a tiny ...
0
votes
1answer
46 views

Is this a transcendental philosophical question?

If I ask the question: "Is it possible to define knowledge by proving that there exists something that can't be known?" to which branch of philosophy does this question belong? Is it transcendental ...
5
votes
1answer
132 views

What is the current state of the Correspondence Theory of Truth?

Is the Correspondent Theory of Truth currently the most important way of thinking about the nature of truth? What alternatives are important? Is there a version of the Correspondent Theory of Truth ...
0
votes
2answers
55 views

Relation between an argument and false premise on Knowledge

If I argue something from a premise such as "It's raining where I wrote this question" which is contingent false, then is it true that I could argue or deduct anything? For example, from the premise ...
9
votes
3answers
394 views

Do machine learning algorithms have knowledge?

By "machine learning algorithm" I'm referring to basic, primarily statistical, machine learning algorithms; for concrete examples consider simple classifier algorithms like SVM or Bayesian classifier ...
2
votes
1answer
68 views

Is there any relation between an Argument and corresponding conditional?

In my philosophy class, where we cover theory of knowledge, I leaned about Gettier problem. Gettier's counterexample to JTB is following: From A has Ford which is justified false belief, B can deduct ...
2
votes
0answers
43 views

Question on the duality between necessity/knowledge and possibility [closed]

(1) Who first said that necessity and possibility are dual to each other? (2) Who first said that knowledge and possibility are dual to each other?
-1
votes
3answers
696 views

Difference between science knowledge and religious knowledge [closed]

Why would both educated and uneducated people believe that earthquakes are the wrath of God?
6
votes
4answers
162 views

Are there formal theories for grouping different knowledge areas?

What do you know about the boundaries between different bodies of knowledge, e.g. bodies of science. I think it's a common question, e.g. "where's the boundary between mathematics and physics". But ...
0
votes
0answers
16 views

Views about the composition of processes? (Self reference?)

What are some philosophical theories that analyze the composition of processes (e.g. "I think", "I think that I think", "I regret", "I regret that I regret" etc)? Mathematics allows the composition ...
1
vote
2answers
91 views

Why do some philosophers argue that we do not know, a priori, that something thinks?

The Cartesian argument seems to explicate the fact that I necessarily know that something thinks, and that I necessarily know that something thinks even if I don't checking the world to verify whether ...
4
votes
3answers
151 views

How do we acquire knowledge?

Lately, I have come to the sad realisation that I know virtually nothing. This understanding was only fully realised for me when I looked back on my own education thus far; in spite of having just ...
7
votes
2answers
129 views

Was Locke right that analytic knowledge is vacuous?

According to Locke, it is impossible to obtain substantive knowledge from analytic propositions. Statement like triangle has three sides is analytic, but one cannot derive Pythagorean ...
0
votes
2answers
101 views

how to deal with “the unknown unknown” [closed]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiPe1OiKQuk alot of people make fun of Rumsfeld for the "unknown unknowns", but i'm wondering how a person like him would start to try to get his hands around the "...
3
votes
4answers
163 views

Why are some communication failures regarded as important opinions in philosophy?

As a newbie here (though not on SO or on the net before that) I am surprised at the number of questions about what some philosopher meant. Examples, just picked from the time point of writing this ...