Truth has long been a central subject in philosophy. Theories of truth deal with questions such as what truths are, what makes them true and what is the nature of the relation between them.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

-1
votes
0answers
35 views

Is the United States currently the most fascistically inclined country on the face of the planet? [on hold]

While not endorsing anything near to the Third Reich's 'final solution', in all other respects, is not the United States the most fascistically oriented country extant currently?
-4
votes
0answers
30 views

Why are most of us standing poised at the edge of brilliance, and haunted by the knowledge of our proximity? [on hold]

‘Most of us stand poised at the edge of brilliance, haunted by the knowledge of our proximity, yet still demonstrably on the wrong side of the line.’ Alain de Botton, The Pleasures and Sorrows of ...
0
votes
1answer
39 views

Does this justify truth-table of material conditional?

I'm sure someone has thought of this before, but I haven't seen this justification (if it is one at all) for why the truth-table of the material conditional is the way it is in both literature on the ...
0
votes
1answer
86 views

Can a sentence without a truth value be true?

I was doing some very, super, light reading on self reference. It seems to me that the statement nothing that I say is true both: cannot be understood with the T-schema; is self referential. ...
1
vote
2answers
44 views

What can I research in terms of philosophy that is relevant to logic and programming?

I'm interested in anything about examining statements, truth and what is a valid argument in the context of a debate. Feel free to add further suggestions according to the question.
5
votes
2answers
107 views

Choosing between different theories according to Rorty, based on Kuhn

Popper tried to distinguish a scientific framework from a non-scientific framework ( like Marxism or Psychoanalysis, according to him) by suggesting the criterion of falsification. Kuhn suggested ...
2
votes
1answer
24 views

Does Coherentism lead to relativism?

Source: p 273 Top, Introducing Philosophy for Canadians: A Text with Integrated Readings (2011 1 ed). Primary Source: 'Could Truth Be Coherence with a System of Beliefs?' by Uni. of Victoria Prof. ...
1
vote
2answers
95 views

Why are negative facts more 'shadowy' than positive facts?

Source: p 268 Middle, Introducing Philosophy for Canadians: A Text with Integrated Readings (2011 1 ed).   Second, the theory doesn't satisfactorily explain what true beliefs correspond to. With ...
0
votes
1answer
62 views

Is truth telling important or just having good intentions is enough? [closed]

Are good intentions enough to warrant not telling the truth? I am especially interested in when we've already lied, and the point in question is whether we should confess. Do any philosophers write ...
1
vote
4answers
108 views

Truth Value of Sentences Containing Logical Contradictions

Do propositions containing logical contradictions have truth values, or are they meaningless? For example: A) Some married bachelors exist. B) 95% of married bachelors live in Maryland. C) ...
5
votes
2answers
72 views

Self-referring propositions

This proposition is false As you can see in the proposition above, there is a problem. This sentence can't be true, but it can't be false either. I believe that this issue comes from the fact that ...
1
vote
2answers
58 views

To Check or not to Check? [closed]

Samuel and Paul make a wager. They want to know if a certain professor held class the day prior when they were absent. The professor is unreachable, though, so they have to ask students from class. If ...
0
votes
2answers
98 views

Why does what I've written fail to define truth?

(Also posted in mathstackexchange prior to this). I stumbled across a set of axioms for first order logic a bit ago. Intrigued, I decided to try to write it all down and organise what I read. After I ...
2
votes
2answers
62 views

Tarski's semantic conception of truth

Does Tarski's semantic conception of truth X is true if and only if p (where X is the name of a sentence, and p is the sentence itself) apply to all sentences or only to facts (understood as ...
3
votes
1answer
68 views

Tarski's original proof of the undefinability of truth

I'm trying to understand Tarski's proof of the undefinability of truth as given in his paper The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages (English translation in Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, ...
1
vote
3answers
104 views

What is the nature of pragmatism as a claim? Can pragmatism ever be understood as a claim in light of its own conditions?

Pragmatism is the suggestion that truth-value and meaning should be talked about in terms of the way we use those terms. All such talk should be hashed out in terms of the practical bearings of such ...
2
votes
2answers
98 views

Are all self-evident truths necessarily redundant?

Every justificationist theory of knowledge has axioms and premises that it begins with. This fact has led skeptics to criticize the possibility of knowledge by noting the infinite regress within any ...
4
votes
1answer
54 views

What makes a relation 'satisfactory' under William James's pragmatist account of truth?

William James wrote that "Ideas ... become true just in so far as they help us to get into satisfactory relations with other parts of experience" (James 1907). What makes any given relation more '...
9
votes
3answers
235 views

Is there a way to avoid Gödel's incompleteness affecting mathematics as a whole?

I have been thinking about Gödel's incompleteness theorems and their ramifications for the whole of mathematics. In this question I assume some fixed formal system F expressive enough for the ...
3
votes
3answers
135 views

Is the claim that atheism is the null hypothesis invalid because it applies a physical measurement to the metaphysical?

I've heard several people state that: Atheism is the null hypothesis. ie that this null hypothesis can be falsified: if one piece of evidence is found to contradict it, the existence is considered ...
2
votes
1answer
83 views

If “All S is P” is true, does it contradict “No non-S is non-P”?

I have a problem I encountered in a logic textbook that I cannot figure out after multiple tries. Say we assume that "All S is P" is true. Does this allow us to conclude the truth value of "No Non-S ...
0
votes
4answers
141 views

Can we have knowledge if it all turns out to be untrue?

Can every apparently true belief turn out to be untrue: and what is the word for this stance? I would assume it would mean we have no knowledge: is that right? Someone on a forum I use keeps ...
1
vote
2answers
128 views

Can reason defend itself without resort to reason?

I recently read, "Reason can't defend itself without resort to reason." Is this universally true?
3
votes
2answers
109 views

Can the correspondence theory of truth really be completely avoided?

Let us assume that 'truth' is a construct of the human mind. In this case truth is defined as some product of the mind's 'verification', and nothing else. What 'makes' a statement true is simply the ...
3
votes
3answers
81 views

How Can the Unobservable be Verified?

Empirical evaluations and judgments concerning the observable world (e.g. whether or not I'm eating a watermelon right now) are evidently verifiable; you can confirm that I am indeed eating a ...
3
votes
4answers
172 views

Are there exceptions to the principle of the excluded middle?

It is inherent in our truth tables that we configure a statement to be either true or false, but it seems that this might have certain exceptions, especially in conditionals. For example, the ...
2
votes
1answer
62 views

Is there an approach to modal logic without Lewis's axioms and possible worlds?

Would it be desirable to carry out a deflationary research programme in modal logic? In other words, would it be desirable to re-think modal logic without Lewis's axioms? possible worlds semantics
3
votes
8answers
356 views

Can something be true if it does not follow logic?

Can something be true if it is not logical? Can something be true if it does not follow logic? if I can't deduce it logically? or if it contradicts logic? In other words: if someone says statement X ...
3
votes
2answers
69 views

Is Tarski's theory of truth compatible with intuitionism?

Intuitionistically, truth is identified with provability: A is true means that it is possible to prove A. In his essay "Intuitionistic logic a philosophical challenge, Logic and Philoshophy" (1980) ...
2
votes
3answers
90 views

Is “Truth” something like a Dirac Delta Function?

To me, Truth is simply what is the case. It is not a matter of reasoning, and it could not be otherwise. Knowledge is a set of beliefs which accord with reality (what is true). Beliefs can be false. ...
2
votes
3answers
60 views

Granted Hume's psychological perspective regarding impressions and ideas, doesn't this make his epistemology obscure?

Hume held that all that was meaningfully present to the mind consisted in matters of fact (impressions) and relations of ideas. But even ideas were faint impressions themselves, formed over time by ...
1
vote
3answers
165 views

What is the difference between real and nominal definitions?

What is the difference between real and nominal definitions? Is it philosophically accurate to say that real definitions (as opposed to nominal definitions) can be true or false? Take for example, ...
12
votes
3answers
204 views

What is the relation between proof in mathematics and observation in physics?

Recently in his 2015 Hirzebruch Lecture in Bonn, Arthur Jaffe re-amplified his famous perspective that finding proof in mathematics is analogous to making experimental observation in physics. In ...
2
votes
3answers
101 views

What is the philosophical difference between “Reality” and “Truth”? [closed]

While talking philosophically, I want to know the difference between Reality and Truth. Especially while Asking this question, I've used Reality/Truth because I don't know How they are different in ...
2
votes
1answer
116 views

Why might truth imply necessity?

It seems well established (or, well-accepted) that necessity implies truth. For instance, in a context of epistemic logic, if one knows A, then A is true. On the other hand, I found on the Internet ...
1
vote
0answers
53 views

Using the conception of 'reliable, unchanging' does 'truth' exist?

An 'archaic' definition for TRUE,TRUTH implies constancy, reliability, unchanging, fidelity. Using this concept of TRUTH is the following valid? There exists either that which is TRUE or that which ...
0
votes
2answers
68 views

Why does one need 'proof' that God exists - What constitues 'proof'?

Does something need to have proof demonstrated for it to be true? If I say "I love my wife!" but you don't buy it... does that mean it is not true?
6
votes
2answers
124 views

How does strong evidence imply truth?

I have seen a great number of individuals who take a step from "There is overwhelming evidence to suggest theory X is true" to "Theory X is true." (I think I misworded the former sentence ...
5
votes
3answers
174 views

Truth and wavefunction [closed]

Well to be honest, my major is physics. And I only started some low level philosophy recently. So please criticize my opinions so that I can advance more quickly. :-) My problem started with Russell'...
1
vote
1answer
234 views

What are Nietzsche's views on truth and logic - for real this time

I'm trying to make sense of Beyond Good and Evil and Nietzsche's views at that time. The claims he makes about truth and logic seem problematic to me: "Granted, we will truth: why not untruth ...
5
votes
1answer
138 views

What is the current state of the Correspondence Theory of Truth?

Is the Correspondent Theory of Truth currently the most important way of thinking about the nature of truth? What alternatives are important? Is there a version of the Correspondent Theory of Truth ...
0
votes
2answers
56 views

Relation between an argument and false premise on Knowledge

If I argue something from a premise such as "It's raining where I wrote this question" which is contingent false, then is it true that I could argue or deduct anything? For example, from the premise ...
6
votes
4answers
263 views

Shouldn't statements be considered equivalent based on their meaning rather than truth tables?

Consider the following truth table, which serves to define the logical connective ⇔, P | Q || P⇔Q T | T || T T | F || F F | T || F F | F || T According to the above truth table, the logical ...
1
vote
0answers
141 views

What is the relationship between meaning and truth? [closed]

For all I can see, a sentence (or a string of symbols, etc) can only have a truth value if it is meaningful. What does this entail vis-à-vis the relationship between meaning and truth? Are a ...
2
votes
3answers
394 views

Are there necessary truths in physical theories, more or less strictly speaking?

There are such things as mathematically necessary truths: 1=1, say; and logically neccessary truths: the law of modus ponens, say. But can there be one in physics? In Lewis's plural worlds where ...
4
votes
1answer
170 views

Absolute Truth - Is there existence?

I restate the question in a simpler and more specific way; is there a proof or has a philosopher proved, that things can be absolute and observed by each in the same way? Are there like conserved ...
3
votes
3answers
97 views

Can correspondence and coherence views of truth be compatible?

If in the course of interacting with an external world, a person is creating a set of coherent knowledge about this world, then there should be a mapping between their beliefs and the external facts. ...
5
votes
6answers
214 views

Finding a clear difference between truth and fact [duplicate]

I have been starting back in school after a long hiatus. In one of my classes, a discussion of Truth began. The problem I have had is that no one seems to have a solid definition between the two. ...
14
votes
11answers
4k views

Is everything just an opinion?

I read some people don't believe in truth but do believe there is always a chance that x. I have a question about such thought. I recently heard an anecdote that says nobody can ever prove I ate ...
1
vote
3answers
180 views

Is it possible to prove the invalidity of logic without using logic?

Is it possible to validly invalidate logic without using logic? Mere assertion gives rise to the question, "How do you know?". At that point, you end up having to use logic to justify the thesis ...