Truth has long been a central subject in philosophy. Theories of truth deal with questions such as what truths are, what makes them true and what is the nature of the relation between them.

learn more… | top users | synonyms

0
votes
0answers
34 views

Do colours/colors exist? [on hold]

The title pretty much sums it up. But I'm particularly concerned about this image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_illusion They call it an illusion, but it really isn't, it's just a normal ...
1
vote
2answers
45 views

What is the nature of pragmatism as a claim? Can pragmatism ever be understood as a claim in light of its own conditions?

Pragmatism is the suggestion that truth-value and meaning should be talked about in terms of the way we use those terms. All such talk should be hashed out in terms of the practical bearings of such ...
1
vote
2answers
55 views

Are all self-evident truths necessarily redundant?

Every justificationist theory of knowledge has axioms and premises that it begins with. This fact has led skeptics to criticize the possibility of knowledge by noting the infinite regress within any ...
3
votes
1answer
44 views

What makes a relation 'satisfactory' under William James's pragmatist account of truth?

William James wrote that "Ideas ... become true just in so far as they help us to get into satisfactory relations with other parts of experience" (James 1907). What makes any given relation more ...
8
votes
3answers
167 views

Is there a way to avoid Gödel incompleteness affecting mathematics as a whole?

I've been thinking about Gödel's incompleteness theorems and their ramifications for the whole of mathematics. In this question I assume some fixed formal system F expressive enough for the theorems ...
3
votes
3answers
126 views

Is the claim that atheism is the null hypothesis invalid because it applies a physical measurement to the metaphysical?

I've heard several people state that: Atheism is the null hypothesis. ie that this null hypothesis can be falsified: if one piece of evidence is found to contradict it, the existence is considered ...
2
votes
1answer
67 views

If “All S is P” is true, does it contradict “No non-S is non-P”?

I have a problem I encountered in a logic textbook that I cannot figure out after multiple tries. Say we assume that "All S is P" is true. Does this allow us to conclude the truth value of "No Non-S ...
0
votes
3answers
64 views

Can we have knowledge if it all turns out to be untrue?

Can every apparently true belief turn out to be untrue: and what is the word for this stance? I would assume it would mean we have no knowledge: is that right? Someone on a forum I use keeps ...
1
vote
2answers
103 views

Can reason defend itself without resort to reason?

I recently read, "Reason can't defend itself without resort to reason." Is this universally true?
3
votes
2answers
96 views

Can the correspondence theory of truth really be completely avoided?

Let us assume that 'truth' is a construct of the human mind. In this case truth is defined as some product of the mind's 'verification', and nothing else. What 'makes' a statement true is simply the ...
3
votes
3answers
58 views

How Can the Unobservable be Verified?

Empirical evaluations and judgments concerning the observable world (e.g. whether or not I'm eating a watermelon right now) are evidently verifiable; you can confirm that I am indeed eating a ...
3
votes
4answers
148 views

Are there exceptions to the principle of the excluded middle?

It is inherent in our truth tables that we configure a statement to be either true or false, but it seems that this might have certain exceptions, especially in conditionals. For example, the ...
2
votes
1answer
52 views

Modal logic without Lewis's axioms?

Would it be desirable to carry out a deflationary research programme in modal logic? In other words, would it be desirable to re-think modal logic without Lewis's axioms?
1
vote
4answers
168 views

Can something be true if it does not follow logic?

Can something be true if it is not logical? Can something be true if it does not follow logic? if I can't deduce it logically? or if it contradicts logic? In other words: if someone says statement X ...
2
votes
2answers
61 views

Is Tarski's theory of truth compatible with intuitionism?

Intuitionistically, truth is identified with provability: A is true means that it is possible to prove A. In his essay "Intuitionistic logic a philosophical challenge, Logic and Philoshophy" (1980) ...
2
votes
3answers
88 views

Is “Truth” something like a Dirac Delta Function?

To me, Truth is simply what is the case. It is not a matter of reasoning, and it could not be otherwise. Knowledge is a set of beliefs which accord with reality (what is true). Beliefs can be false. ...
2
votes
3answers
57 views

Granted Hume's psychological perspective regarding impressions and ideas, doesn't this make his epistemology obscure?

Hume held that all that was meaningfully present to the mind consisted in matters of fact (impressions) and relations of ideas. But even ideas were faint impressions themselves, formed over time by ...
1
vote
3answers
83 views

What is the difference between real and nominal definitions?

What is the difference between real and nominal definitions? Is it philosophically accurate to say that real definitions (as opposed to nominal definitions) can be true or false? Take for example, ...
11
votes
3answers
191 views

What is the relation between proof in mathematics and observation in physics?

Recently in his 2015 Hirzebruch Lecture in Bonn, Arthur Jaffe re-amplified his famous perspective that finding proof in mathematics is analogous to making experimental observation in physics. In ...
2
votes
3answers
90 views

What is the philosophical difference between “Reality” and “Truth”? [closed]

While talking philosophically, I want to know the difference between Reality and Truth. Especially while Asking this question, I've used Reality/Truth because I don't know How they are different in ...
2
votes
1answer
113 views

Why might truth imply necessity?

It seems well established (or, well-accepted) that necessity implies truth. For instance, in a context of epistemic logic, if one knows A, then A is true. On the other hand, I found on the Internet ...
1
vote
0answers
46 views

Using the conception of 'reliable, unchanging' does 'truth' exist?

An 'archaic' definition for TRUE,TRUTH implies constancy, reliability, unchanging, fidelity. Using this concept of TRUTH is the following valid? There exists either that which is TRUE or that which ...
0
votes
2answers
67 views

Why does one need 'proof' that God exists - What constitues 'proof'?

Does something need to have proof demonstrated for it to be true? If I say "I love my wife!" but you don't buy it... does that mean it is not true?
5
votes
2answers
110 views

How does strong evidence imply truth?

I have seen a great number of individuals who take a step from "There is overwhelming evidence to suggest theory X is true" to "Theory X is true." (I think I misworded the former sentence ...
5
votes
3answers
171 views

Truth and wavefunction [closed]

Well to be honest, my major is physics. And I only started some low level philosophy recently. So please criticize my opinions so that I can advance more quickly. :-) My problem started with ...
0
votes
1answer
161 views

What are Nietzsche's views on truth and logic - for real this time

I'm trying to make sense of Beyond Good and Evil and Nietzsche's views at that time. The claims he makes about truth and logic seem problematic to me: "Granted, we will truth: why not untruth ...
5
votes
1answer
129 views

What is the current state of the Correspondence Theory of Truth?

Is the Correspondent Theory of Truth currently the most important way of thinking about the nature of truth? What alternatives are important? Is there a version of the Correspondent Theory of Truth ...
0
votes
2answers
55 views

Relation between an argument and false premise on Knowledge

If I argue something from a premise such as "It's raining where I wrote this question" which is contingent false, then is it true that I could argue or deduct anything? For example, from the premise ...
5
votes
4answers
184 views

Content-based equivalence vs. truth-functional equivalence: the difference between ≡ and ⇔?

Edit: I have rewritten the entire body of my question and tried also to choose a more fitting title. Another suitable title, suggested by Conifold, is Shouldn't statements be considered equivalent ...
1
vote
0answers
120 views

What is the relationship between meaning and truth? [closed]

For all I can see, a sentence (or a string of symbols, etc) can only have a truth value if it is meaningful. What does this entail vis-à-vis the relationship between meaning and truth? Are a ...
4
votes
1answer
163 views

Absolute Truth - Is there existence?

I restate the question in a simpler and more specific way; is there a proof or has a philosopher proved, that things can be absolute and observed by each in the same way? Are there like conserved ...
3
votes
3answers
94 views

Can correspondence and coherence views of truth be compatible?

If in the course of interacting with an external world, a person is creating a set of coherent knowledge about this world, then there should be a mapping between their beliefs and the external facts. ...
5
votes
6answers
193 views

Finding a clear difference between truth and fact [duplicate]

I have been starting back in school after a long hiatus. In one of my classes, a discussion of Truth began. The problem I have had is that no one seems to have a solid definition between the two. ...
14
votes
11answers
4k views

Is everything just an opinion?

I read some people don't believe in truth but do believe there is always a chance that x. I have a question about such thought. I recently heard an anecdote that says nobody can ever prove I ate ...
1
vote
3answers
176 views

Is it possible to prove the invalidity of logic without using logic?

Is it possible to validly invalidate logic without using logic? Mere assertion gives rise to the question, "How do you know?". At that point, you end up having to use logic to justify the thesis ...
1
vote
1answer
83 views

Do questions about the ultimate truth make sense? Are we capable of understanding the system in which we live? (Looking for directions/references)

I am recently reading a lot about topics like free will or consciousness. It seems that many philosophers are trying to argue about these concepts in an ultimate and final way, that means they are ...
1
vote
1answer
91 views

Fundamental Truths in Philosophy [duplicate]

Many years ago I took a philosophy class that covered Descartes. The teacher logically explained to us the "I think Therefore I am" over the course of a week. He also said that it was one of the ...
1
vote
4answers
87 views

Truth and actuality

J. Krishnamurti and Prof. David Bohm discuss the topic of truth and actuality (reality). They touch on reality however in my opinion and understanding don't clarify or define truth. For example, ...
-2
votes
1answer
149 views

Truth Tables and Venn Diagrams: Prove Contingent statement are consistent [closed]

I am trying to prove how consistent statements can be contigent. The problem i am having how to use a truth table to prove this.
3
votes
1answer
88 views

Do malformed propositions have True/False values?

Many people are familiar with the malformed questions that, no matter which way they are answered, reflect poorly on the person to whom they were asked. For example: Have you stopped beating your ...
0
votes
2answers
69 views

Is truth inherent in honesty? [closed]

Is truth inherent in honesty? In other words, may we establish a correlation, an isomorphism if you will, a functor, perhaps a forgetful one? Between truth and honesty? Pardon me, this question is ...
1
vote
3answers
354 views

If all the premises of an argument are true, is the argument logically valid?

Where an argument is said to be logically valid "if and only if it is not possible for the premises to e true and the conclusion false". I know that the argument is indeed logically valid if all the ...
0
votes
4answers
159 views

An Argument for the Unity of Truth?

I was thinking about truth, and came up with an outline for an argument that there is only one truth. However, this is just an outline and it is flawed, so I'm hoping you can help me critique and fix ...
0
votes
1answer
96 views

What's the difference between true statements and real information? [closed]

In Sweden we have legislation about "Osant intygande" - "Untrue verification" e.g. false and fabricated Ph D diploma or similar "Oriktig uppgift" - "Not a real piece of information" e.g. ...
0
votes
3answers
109 views

On the foundations of physics

Scientific theories in physics have to be validated by experiments. But experiments are to be interpreted in the context of scientific theories. Isn'it like a snake biting its own tail? For example, ...
0
votes
0answers
49 views

Truth in Aquinas metaphysics

From what I'm reading, Aquinas distinguished truth in two senses: Ontological truth: It's the adaptation(adequation ?) of the 'created being' to God's understanding, whereby it fulfils that for ...
3
votes
2answers
108 views

English Sentence to Logical Proposition Doubt

I am a newbie to Stack-Exchange and if there is any problem in my question -- I apologize beforehand . I was working my way through some Propositional Logic Questions in Discrete Maths by Rosen , ...
0
votes
1answer
64 views

Double arrow elimination

I know that P <=> Q becomes (p => q) ^ (q => p)using double arrow elimination but how about the following ? ~(P <=> Q) becoming ~(p => q) ^ ~(q => p) ? Also (~P <=> Q) ...
3
votes
2answers
608 views

Did Friedrich Nietzsche believe in “the truth”?

It is well known that Friedrich Nietzsche was very condemnatory of the objective truth, however, while analyzing his words, it is difficult to ascertain whether or not he believes in the truth at all. ...
-2
votes
1answer
72 views

What if the tallest height is considered the most beautiful? [closed]

What if some people defined the tallest height is considered the most beautiful? Some philosopher claimed that the most beautiful human doesn't exist. Can there be any "most beautiful" human?