1,754 reputation
bio website
location New York City
age 41
visits member for 2 years, 10 months
seen yesterday

I consider myself a logical positivist, although I have never read the logical positivists. I read a little philosophy from time to time, always by skimming (so as to avoid having an aneurysm from getting pissed off). I believe the field is bankrupt intellectual fraud, with a handful of honest practitioners who didn't achieve any progress, because they are drowned out by impressive sounding political clowns. The honest folks are Russell, Carnap, Dennett, and I can't think of anybody else.

The problem with philosophy is not that the questions are bad, nor that they have no answers. The problem is that the mechanism philosophers use to sift through the answers over historical time is political persuasion, and this mechanism doesn't work. The result of political decisions is that obscuratist frauds like Hegel get credit for deep thoughts, and honest folks are marginalized and dismissed. Therefore, I don't see much point in attentively reading the works of philosophers, as their training is of negative value.

But maybe the internet can make some progress in this field.

Physics 58,280 rep 481199
Philosophy 1,754 rep 616
Mathematics 1,236 rep 67
Biblical Hermeneutics 1,064 rep 1620
Christianity 753 rep 39

79 Votes Cast

all time   by type  
74 up 41 question
5 down 38 answer