Skip to main content
Last sentence deleted as not relevant.
Source Link
Ludwig V
  • 3k
  • 1
  • 6
  • 25

For me, the most intuitive answer is that the end product was created by a combination of you and the AI tool operating together. As every event in the universe is a result of multiple, or many, conditions or factors.

We often like to assign a single main cause to events by asking "what" (implying an inanimate source) or "who" (implying a human source) but these English constructs can be misleading.

This point of view might be seen as belonging to Linguistic Relativity or Linguistic Determinism.

For me, the most intuitive answer is that the end product was created by a combination of you and the AI tool operating together. As every event in the universe is a result of multiple, or many, conditions or factors.

We often like to assign a single main cause to events by asking "what" (implying an inanimate source) or "who" (implying a human source) but these English constructs can be misleading.

This point of view might be seen as belonging to Linguistic Relativity or Linguistic Determinism.

For me, the most intuitive answer is that the end product was created by a combination of you and the AI tool operating together. As every event in the universe is a result of multiple, or many, conditions or factors.

We often like to assign a single main cause to events by asking "what" (implying an inanimate source) or "who" (implying a human source) but these English constructs can be misleading.

Source Link

For me, the most intuitive answer is that the end product was created by a combination of you and the AI tool operating together. As every event in the universe is a result of multiple, or many, conditions or factors.

We often like to assign a single main cause to events by asking "what" (implying an inanimate source) or "who" (implying a human source) but these English constructs can be misleading.

This point of view might be seen as belonging to Linguistic Relativity or Linguistic Determinism.