Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 16 at 15:05 answer added tkruse timeline score: 0
Jun 16 at 14:04 comment added user6527 @PaulRoss if you mean odds as a ratio of probabilities, then it is still a representation of a probability. "but each person may offer their own odds," how does that differ from "but each person may offer their own subjectivist Bayesian probability"?
Jun 16 at 13:58 comment added Paul Ross @DikranMarsupial, odds are not probabilities! It is rational to hold your odds as close to the objective probability of the event as possible, but each person may offer their own odds, and given the information at their disposal, two individuals might offer different odds but both be rational in doing so. If there is genuine metaphysical indeterminacy, there may be no matter of fact as to who is right, as well.
Jun 16 at 12:27 answer added Ioannis Paizis timeline score: 0
Jun 16 at 11:57 comment added user6527 @Cornifold is it more likely that magnetic monopoles exist than stars outside the visible universe (neither of which we have observed)? The good thing about attaching numbers to subjective beliefs is that it allows you to see if you have updated those subjective beliefs rationally when you get evidence (e.g. in a court of law).
Jun 16 at 11:52 answer added user6527 timeline score: 4
Jun 16 at 11:01 answer added causative timeline score: 3
Jun 16 at 8:46 answer added gnasher729 timeline score: 1
Jun 16 at 6:55 comment added Conifold Like you evaluate (or not) whether magnetic monopoles exist or whether Thales existed, without probabilities. Putting fake numbers on heuristic reasoning does not add anything useful to it.
Jun 16 at 6:00 answer added niels nielsen timeline score: 2
Jun 16 at 0:21 comment added Hart Lort Well then how do I evaluate whether or not god exists then? @Conifold
Jun 15 at 3:32 history edited Hart Lort CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
S Jun 15 at 3:16 review First questions
Jun 16 at 8:51
S Jun 15 at 3:16 history asked Hart Lort CC BY-SA 4.0