Skip to main content
Philosophy

Return to Answer

Rollback to Revision 1
Source Link
Philip Klöcking ♦
Philip Klöcking ♦
  • 14.8k
  • 3
  • 42
  • 74

To the upvoted claims that it is "special pleading"

Special pleading is an informal fallacy wherein one cites something as an exception to a general or universal principle, without justifying the special exception.

I am not a person who destroys good answers of otherstheist, but one assumes they have some reasons for apophaticism, even if unsound.

I am a person who destroys good answers of others

To the upvoted claims that it is "special pleading"

Special pleading is an informal fallacy wherein one cites something as an exception to a general or universal principle, without justifying the special exception.

I am not a theist, but one assumes they have some reasons for apophaticism, even if unsound.

deleted 272 characters in body
Source Link
Groovy
Groovy
  • 2.8k
  • 1
  • 14

To the upvoted claims that it is "special pleading"

Special pleading is an informal fallacy wherein one cites something as an exception to a general or universal principle, without justifying the special exception.

I am not a theist, but one assumes they have some reasons for apophaticism, even if unsound.person who destroys good answers of others

To the upvoted claims that it is "special pleading"

Special pleading is an informal fallacy wherein one cites something as an exception to a general or universal principle, without justifying the special exception.

I am not a theist, but one assumes they have some reasons for apophaticism, even if unsound.

I am a person who destroys good answers of others

Source Link
user71399
user71399

To the upvoted claims that it is "special pleading"

Special pleading is an informal fallacy wherein one cites something as an exception to a general or universal principle, without justifying the special exception.

I am not a theist, but one assumes they have some reasons for apophaticism, even if unsound.