Timeline for Does Gödel’s incompleteness theorems imply the necessity of an infinite recursive hierarchy of “proofs”, and that any “proof” is relative?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Sep 10 at 4:43 | history | mod moved comments to chat | |||
| S Sep 10 at 4:43 | comment | added | Philip Klöcking♦ | Comments have been moved to chat; please do not continue the discussion here. Before posting a comment below this one, please review the purposes of comments. Comments that do not request clarification or suggest improvements usually belong as an answer, on Philosophy Meta, or in Philosophy Chat. Comments continuing discussion may be removed. | |
| Sep 9 at 16:47 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Sep 9 at 9:56 | answer | added | Speakpigeon | timeline score: -4 | |
| Sep 9 at 9:47 | answer | added | Mauro ALLEGRANZA | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 9 at 9:04 | history | edited | The Pointer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 229 characters in body
|
| Sep 9 at 8:58 | history | edited | The Pointer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 229 characters in body
|
| Sep 9 at 8:51 | history | edited | The Pointer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 90 characters in body
|
| S Sep 9 at 8:47 | review | First questions | |||
| Sep 9 at 9:57 | |||||
| S Sep 9 at 8:47 | history | asked | The Pointer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |