2 added 1 character in body
source | link

I don't understand the question.

Why would you be unable to judge thoughts as being morally wrong? If someone is thinking about kidnapping me, I'm perfectly within my rights to judge their thoughts as being immoral, and to claim that they isare thinking evil thoughts. Why wouldn't I be? I don't see what would make thoughts immune to moral evaluation.

I believe you may be confusing our ability to morally judge with the concept of acting upon those convictions. For example, we can imprison criminals because they have committed such behaviors that society has the right to protect itself from them. We don't imprison people for though-crime, because it's obviously almost impossible to prove, and doesn't directly harm anyone until the thoughts manifest as actions.

To answer your question:

Can a thought without a corresponding action be morally wrong?

Yes it can. There is nothing stopping your from morally evaluating a thought.

I don't understand the question.

Why would you be unable to judge thoughts as being morally wrong? If someone is thinking about kidnapping me, I'm perfectly within my rights to judge their thoughts as being immoral, and to claim that they is thinking evil thoughts. Why wouldn't I be? I don't see what would make thoughts immune to moral evaluation.

I believe you may be confusing our ability to morally judge with the concept of acting upon those convictions. For example, we can imprison criminals because they have committed such behaviors that society has the right to protect itself from them. We don't imprison people for though-crime, because it's obviously almost impossible to prove, and doesn't directly harm anyone until the thoughts manifest as actions.

To answer your question:

Can a thought without a corresponding action be morally wrong?

Yes it can. There is nothing stopping your from morally evaluating a thought.

I don't understand the question.

Why would you be unable to judge thoughts as being morally wrong? If someone is thinking about kidnapping me, I'm perfectly within my rights to judge their thoughts as being immoral, and to claim that they are thinking evil thoughts. Why wouldn't I be? I don't see what would make thoughts immune to moral evaluation.

I believe you may be confusing our ability to morally judge with the concept of acting upon those convictions. For example, we can imprison criminals because they have committed such behaviors that society has the right to protect itself from them. We don't imprison people for though-crime, because it's obviously almost impossible to prove, and doesn't directly harm anyone until the thoughts manifest as actions.

To answer your question:

Can a thought without a corresponding action be morally wrong?

Yes it can. There is nothing stopping your from morally evaluating a thought.

1
source | link

I don't understand the question.

Why would you be unable to judge thoughts as being morally wrong? If someone is thinking about kidnapping me, I'm perfectly within my rights to judge their thoughts as being immoral, and to claim that they is thinking evil thoughts. Why wouldn't I be? I don't see what would make thoughts immune to moral evaluation.

I believe you may be confusing our ability to morally judge with the concept of acting upon those convictions. For example, we can imprison criminals because they have committed such behaviors that society has the right to protect itself from them. We don't imprison people for though-crime, because it's obviously almost impossible to prove, and doesn't directly harm anyone until the thoughts manifest as actions.

To answer your question:

Can a thought without a corresponding action be morally wrong?

Yes it can. There is nothing stopping your from morally evaluating a thought.