Timeline for What would Kant do when two categorical imperatives conflict? Could he ever justify lying?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2012 at 12:33 | review | Late answers | |||
| Nov 8, 2012 at 21:16 | |||||
| Nov 2, 2011 at 17:15 | comment | added | JKubecki | @MichaelDorfman, I was addressing the second part of the question: "Or, if he didn't, how could it be solved hypothetically?" The incident quotes is an illustration of a possible solution of the exact scenario the questioner asked about. | |
| Oct 26, 2011 at 18:28 | comment | added | Cerberus | @Mich: I think it means that God will reward honesty in some mysterious way even if it seems to betray the innocent at first. I highly doubt Kant's religion was so focused on providence. | |
| Oct 26, 2011 at 18:03 | comment | added | Michael Dorfman | Does that anecdote have some bearing on Kantian ethics? I seem to be missing the connection. | |
| Oct 26, 2011 at 17:24 | history | answered | JKubecki | CC BY-SA 3.0 |