Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhilosophy/status/424031135505870849
2 added 25 characters in body
source | link

The Scientific Method is essentially the effort to discover causation in perceived correlations of collected data. In other words it hunts for 'recipes' that can be applied to consistently achieve a desired result, and as such does not inquire into why something happens, but rather into what makes it happen. Philosophy on the other hand is more concerned with the why: what effect does this have on the trustworthiness of the Scientific Method as an philosophical tool?

The Scientific Method is essentially the effort to discover causation in perceived correlations of collected data. In other words it hunts for 'recipes' that can be applied to consistently achieve a desired result, and as such does not inquire into why something happens, but rather into what makes it happen. Philosophy on the other hand is more concerned with the why: what effect does this have on the trustworthiness of the Scientific Method?

The Scientific Method is essentially the effort to discover causation in perceived correlations of collected data. In other words it hunts for 'recipes' that can be applied to consistently achieve a desired result, and as such does not inquire into why something happens, but rather into what makes it happen. Philosophy on the other hand is more concerned with the why: what effect does this have on the trustworthiness of the Scientific Method as an philosophical tool?

1
source | link

Does the Scientific Method of research apply to philosophy?

The Scientific Method is essentially the effort to discover causation in perceived correlations of collected data. In other words it hunts for 'recipes' that can be applied to consistently achieve a desired result, and as such does not inquire into why something happens, but rather into what makes it happen. Philosophy on the other hand is more concerned with the why: what effect does this have on the trustworthiness of the Scientific Method?