deleted 7 characters in body
Source Link
NNOX Apps
  • 1
  • 2
  • 27
  • 82

If X is the necessary condition of A, then it doesn't follow that xX is sufficient. However, if X were a sufficient condition, would it also follow that X is a necessary condition? Put otherwise, is a sufficient condition simply a set of all necessary conditions that conjointly would guarantee that A obtains?

Being able to drive is necessary for someone to qualify as a good driver, but is not sufficient, for qualifying as a good driver.

Being able to drive well is both a necessary and sufficient condition to qualify as a good driver.

If X is the necessary condition of A, then it doesn't follow that x is sufficient. However, if X were a sufficient condition, would it also follow that X is a necessary condition? Put otherwise, is a sufficient condition simply a set of all necessary conditions that conjointly would guarantee that A obtains?

Being able to drive is necessary for someone to qualify as a good driver, but is not sufficient.

Being able to drive well is both a necessary and sufficient condition to qualify as a good driver.

If X is the necessary condition of A, then it doesn't follow that X is sufficient. However, if X were a sufficient condition, would it also follow that X is a necessary condition? Put otherwise, is a sufficient condition simply a set of all necessary conditions that conjointly would guarantee that A obtains?

Being able to drive is necessary, but is not sufficient, for qualifying as a good driver.

Being able to drive well is both a necessary and sufficient condition to qualify as a good driver.

deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
NNOX Apps
  • 1
  • 2
  • 27
  • 82

If xX is the necessary condition of A, then it doesn't follow that x is sufficient. However, if itX were a sufficient condition, would it also follow that xX is a necessary condition? Put otherwise, is a sufficient condition simply a set of all necessary conditions that conjointly would guarantee that A obtains?

Being able to drive is necessary for someone to qualify as a good driver, but is not sufficient.

Being able to drive well is both a necessary and sufficient condition to qualify as a good driver.

If x is the necessary condition of A, then it doesn't follow that x is sufficient. However, if it were a sufficient condition, would it also follow that x is a necessary condition? Put otherwise, is a sufficient condition simply a set of all necessary conditions that conjointly would guarantee that A obtains?

Being able to drive is necessary for someone to qualify as a good driver, but is not sufficient.

Being able to drive well is both a necessary and sufficient condition to qualify as a good driver.

If X is the necessary condition of A, then it doesn't follow that x is sufficient. However, if X were a sufficient condition, would it also follow that X is a necessary condition? Put otherwise, is a sufficient condition simply a set of all necessary conditions that conjointly would guarantee that A obtains?

Being able to drive is necessary for someone to qualify as a good driver, but is not sufficient.

Being able to drive well is both a necessary and sufficient condition to qualify as a good driver.

Source Link
duskn
  • 415
  • 4
  • 11

Are all sufficient conditions necessary?

If x is the necessary condition of A, then it doesn't follow that x is sufficient. However, if it were a sufficient condition, would it also follow that x is a necessary condition? Put otherwise, is a sufficient condition simply a set of all necessary conditions that conjointly would guarantee that A obtains?

Being able to drive is necessary for someone to qualify as a good driver, but is not sufficient.

Being able to drive well is both a necessary and sufficient condition to qualify as a good driver.