Timeline for Questions from a new introduction to modal logic by Hughes and Cresswell
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 17, 2019 at 14:01 | vote | accept | MathematicalPhysicist | ||
May 16, 2019 at 23:36 | answer | added | Graham Kemp | timeline score: 1 | |
S May 16, 2019 at 14:24 | history | suggested | Rob | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
OP failed to explain L & M operators. Hughes and Cresswell use a notation that is far from common. That could create confusion for readers who don't have their book in front of them.
|
May 16, 2019 at 14:19 | answer | added | Rob | timeline score: 0 | |
May 16, 2019 at 13:39 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S May 16, 2019 at 14:24 | |||||
May 16, 2019 at 4:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jan 16, 2019 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhilosophy/status/1085642961059266563 | ||
Jan 16, 2019 at 4:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Dec 17, 2018 at 3:25 | answer | added | Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen | timeline score: 1 | |
S Sep 2, 2015 at 19:07 | history | suggested | DTR |
added logic tag
|
|
Sep 2, 2015 at 9:34 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Sep 2, 2015 at 19:07 | |||||
May 21, 2015 at 8:48 | comment | added | MathematicalPhysicist | L is "necessary" operator and M is the "possible" operator. | |
May 20, 2015 at 16:54 | comment | added | Mozibur Ullah | Also it looks as though the contextual information is missing; what kind of seating arrangement and how this is supposed to relate to the use of modal logic etc. | |
May 20, 2015 at 16:52 | comment | added | Mozibur Ullah | It might be useful for people who are familiar with modal logic, but not the specific book you're using, to explain what the operators L & M stand for; I'm not sure that terminology is as standardised for modal logics as it is for say first-order logic. | |
May 20, 2015 at 6:40 | history | asked | MathematicalPhysicist | CC BY-SA 3.0 |