Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 17, 2019 at 14:01 vote accept MathematicalPhysicist
May 16, 2019 at 23:36 answer added Graham Kemp timeline score: 1
S May 16, 2019 at 14:24 history suggested Rob CC BY-SA 4.0
OP failed to explain L & M operators. Hughes and Cresswell use a notation that is far from common. That could create confusion for readers who don't have their book in front of them.
May 16, 2019 at 14:19 answer added Rob timeline score: 0
May 16, 2019 at 13:39 review Suggested edits
S May 16, 2019 at 14:24
May 16, 2019 at 4:04 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jan 16, 2019 at 21:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPhilosophy/status/1085642961059266563
Jan 16, 2019 at 4:03 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Dec 17, 2018 at 3:25 answer added Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen timeline score: 1
S Sep 2, 2015 at 19:07 history suggested DTR
added logic tag
Sep 2, 2015 at 9:34 review Suggested edits
S Sep 2, 2015 at 19:07
May 21, 2015 at 8:48 comment added MathematicalPhysicist L is "necessary" operator and M is the "possible" operator.
May 20, 2015 at 16:54 comment added Mozibur Ullah Also it looks as though the contextual information is missing; what kind of seating arrangement and how this is supposed to relate to the use of modal logic etc.
May 20, 2015 at 16:52 comment added Mozibur Ullah It might be useful for people who are familiar with modal logic, but not the specific book you're using, to explain what the operators L & M stand for; I'm not sure that terminology is as standardised for modal logics as it is for say first-order logic.
May 20, 2015 at 6:40 history asked MathematicalPhysicist CC BY-SA 3.0