5 replaced http://philosophy.stackexchange.com/ with https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/
source | link

I already made a question about Marx herehere. According to Marx, Communism-thinng will be created naturally only after the the Capitalistic mode of the production reaches hight enough ( kindly pardon me to find the corresponding English phrase since it takes time ( I read his works in my language )) and and after conquering the Reification and its culmination social-alienation, where the products human beings made will move by their power accordin to their own principles like something completely unrelated with those who made them. ( For example, kindly consider, if you were a computer programmer. Well, you can see in today's world, your product, for instance, softwares are everyday bought and sold indepentendly of your intention or will etc in the market as if they are no yours anymore. )

I already made a question about Marx here. According to Marx, Communism-thinng will be created naturally only after the the Capitalistic mode of the production reaches hight enough ( kindly pardon me to find the corresponding English phrase since it takes time ( I read his works in my language )) and and after conquering the Reification and its culmination social-alienation, where the products human beings made will move by their power accordin to their own principles like something completely unrelated with those who made them. ( For example, kindly consider, if you were a computer programmer. Well, you can see in today's world, your product, for instance, softwares are everyday bought and sold indepentendly of your intention or will etc in the market as if they are no yours anymore. )

I already made a question about Marx here. According to Marx, Communism-thinng will be created naturally only after the the Capitalistic mode of the production reaches hight enough ( kindly pardon me to find the corresponding English phrase since it takes time ( I read his works in my language )) and and after conquering the Reification and its culmination social-alienation, where the products human beings made will move by their power accordin to their own principles like something completely unrelated with those who made them. ( For example, kindly consider, if you were a computer programmer. Well, you can see in today's world, your product, for instance, softwares are everyday bought and sold indepentendly of your intention or will etc in the market as if they are no yours anymore. )

4 added 26 characters in body
source | link

To me, No ( Here I mean, Capitalism is not a bad thing **accorind to Marx himselfaccoring to Marx himself, sinceor well say, more correctly saying, to me personally, Marx is a hyper-capitalist ( When you read his works ( though I know it is heavy ) with due attention, you will notice it. )

To me, No ( Here I mean, Capitalism is not a bad thing **accorind to Marx himself, since well, to me personally, Marx is a hyper-capitalist ( When you read his works ( though I know it is heavy ) with due attention, you will notice it. )

To me, No ( Here I mean, Capitalism is not a bad thing accoring to Marx himself, or well say, more correctly saying, to me personally, Marx is a hyper-capitalist ( When you read his works ( though I know it is heavy ) with due attention, you will notice it. )

3 deleted 66 characters in body
source | link

Edited due to many English mistakes.

Regarding your question,

As I understand it, Karl Marx was anticaptitalism, but is that such a bad thing?

As I understand it, Karl Marx was anticaptitalism, but is that such a bad thing?

In communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic. ( German Ideology )

In communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic. ( German Ideology )

I know that capitalism provides wealth and opportunity, but I think even today we can see the downfall of capitalism that Marx explains -- the one in which men will use the talents of other men to produce great fortunes for themselves, and only pay the man that produces the item a minimum wage.

I know that capitalism provides wealth and opportunity, but I think even today we can see the downfall of capitalism that Marx explains -- the one in which men will use the talents of other men to produce great fortunes for themselves, and only pay the man that produces the item a minimum wage.

But would a Marxist world be any less productive?

But would a Marxist world be any less productive?

I would like to say No, if one relates his works wih communsim thing. But I would say Yes if one uses his works as the analyzation tools into today's production mode.

Have a good day.

Edited due to many English mistakes.

Regarding your question,

As I understand it, Karl Marx was anticaptitalism, but is that such a bad thing?

In communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic. ( German Ideology )

I know that capitalism provides wealth and opportunity, but I think even today we can see the downfall of capitalism that Marx explains -- the one in which men will use the talents of other men to produce great fortunes for themselves, and only pay the man that produces the item a minimum wage.

But would a Marxist world be any less productive?

I would like to say No, if one relates his works wih communsim thing. But I would say Yes if one uses his works as the analyzation tools into today's production mode.

Have a good day.

Regarding your question,

As I understand it, Karl Marx was anticaptitalism, but is that such a bad thing?

In communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic. ( German Ideology )

I know that capitalism provides wealth and opportunity, but I think even today we can see the downfall of capitalism that Marx explains -- the one in which men will use the talents of other men to produce great fortunes for themselves, and only pay the man that produces the item a minimum wage.

But would a Marxist world be any less productive?

I would like to say No, if one relates his works wih communsim thing. But I would say Yes if one uses his works as the analyzation tools into today's production mode.

2 added 2093 characters in body
source | link
1
source | link