2 added 8 characters in body
source | link

From the Woods/Guyer translation of Kants Critique of Reason:

In order to make room for his own dualistic defence of both modern science and human autonomy, Kant like Descarte, Locke and Hume felt he had to rein in the pretensions of traditional metaphysics, represented to him by Wolff and Baumgarten...[which he called] dogmatism...which he regarded as capriciouscapricious, opinionatedopinionated and faction-riddenfaction-ridden...and consequently unstableunstable.

And

Kant wanted to distinguish his own critical stance towards scepticism from several other ways of rejecting it, which he also regarded as being dangerous for the cause of reason, sceptism, the position he took Hume to advocate...

But he doesn't demolish metaphysics completely - he is providing a critique and a coherent grounding:

The opening book of the Transcendental Dialectic is therefore a derivation and even a limited defence of transcendental ideas such as the immortal soul, free will and God which dogmatic metaphysics had always been preoccupied with.

Also:

Kant has misled those who have supposed that all his work in the years preceding this point was slumbering in Wolffian Dogmatism and that he awoke from slumber through the sceptism of Hume.

And

Further it should not be thought that Kants mature philosophy ... represents an outright rejection of the philosophy of his predecessors, above all the original philosophy of Liebniz.

Since his system can be thought of as

attempt to synthesise Leibnizs vision of the pre-established harmony of the principles of nature and the principles of grace, with the substance of Newtonian science and the moral and political insights of Rousseau.

From the Woods/Guyer translation of Kants Critique of Reason:

In order to make room for his own dualistic defence of both modern science and human autonomy, Kant like Descarte, Locke and Hume felt he had to rein in the pretensions of traditional metaphysics, represented to him by Wolff and Baumgarten...[which he called] dogmatism...which he regarded as capricious, opinionated and faction-ridden...and consequently unstable.

And

Kant wanted to distinguish his own critical stance towards scepticism from several other ways of rejecting it, which he also regarded as being dangerous for the cause of reason, sceptism, the position he took Hume to advocate...

But he doesn't demolish metaphysics completely - he is providing a critique and a coherent grounding:

The opening book of the Transcendental Dialectic is therefore a derivation and even a limited defence of transcendental ideas such as the immortal soul, free will and God which dogmatic metaphysics had always been preoccupied with.

Also:

Kant has misled those who have supposed that all his work in the years preceding this point was slumbering in Wolffian Dogmatism and that he awoke from slumber through the sceptism of Hume.

And

Further it should not be thought that Kants mature philosophy ... represents an outright rejection of the philosophy of his predecessors, above all the original philosophy of Liebniz.

Since his system can be thought of as

attempt to synthesise Leibnizs vision of the pre-established harmony of the principles of nature and the principles of grace, with the substance of Newtonian science and the moral and political insights of Rousseau.

From the Woods/Guyer translation of Kants Critique of Reason:

In order to make room for his own dualistic defence of both modern science and human autonomy, Kant like Descarte, Locke and Hume felt he had to rein in the pretensions of traditional metaphysics, represented to him by Wolff and Baumgarten...[which he called] dogmatism...which he regarded as capricious, opinionated and faction-ridden...and consequently unstable.

And

Kant wanted to distinguish his own critical stance towards scepticism from several other ways of rejecting it, which he also regarded as being dangerous for the cause of reason, sceptism, the position he took Hume to advocate...

But he doesn't demolish metaphysics completely - he is providing a critique and a coherent grounding:

The opening book of the Transcendental Dialectic is therefore a derivation and even a limited defence of transcendental ideas such as the immortal soul, free will and God which dogmatic metaphysics had always been preoccupied with.

Also:

Kant has misled those who have supposed that all his work in the years preceding this point was slumbering in Wolffian Dogmatism and that he awoke from slumber through the sceptism of Hume.

And

Further it should not be thought that Kants mature philosophy ... represents an outright rejection of the philosophy of his predecessors, above all the original philosophy of Liebniz.

Since his system can be thought of as

attempt to synthesise Leibnizs vision of the pre-established harmony of the principles of nature and the principles of grace, with the substance of Newtonian science and the moral and political insights of Rousseau.

1
source | link

From the Woods/Guyer translation of Kants Critique of Reason:

In order to make room for his own dualistic defence of both modern science and human autonomy, Kant like Descarte, Locke and Hume felt he had to rein in the pretensions of traditional metaphysics, represented to him by Wolff and Baumgarten...[which he called] dogmatism...which he regarded as capricious, opinionated and faction-ridden...and consequently unstable.

And

Kant wanted to distinguish his own critical stance towards scepticism from several other ways of rejecting it, which he also regarded as being dangerous for the cause of reason, sceptism, the position he took Hume to advocate...

But he doesn't demolish metaphysics completely - he is providing a critique and a coherent grounding:

The opening book of the Transcendental Dialectic is therefore a derivation and even a limited defence of transcendental ideas such as the immortal soul, free will and God which dogmatic metaphysics had always been preoccupied with.

Also:

Kant has misled those who have supposed that all his work in the years preceding this point was slumbering in Wolffian Dogmatism and that he awoke from slumber through the sceptism of Hume.

And

Further it should not be thought that Kants mature philosophy ... represents an outright rejection of the philosophy of his predecessors, above all the original philosophy of Liebniz.

Since his system can be thought of as

attempt to synthesise Leibnizs vision of the pre-established harmony of the principles of nature and the principles of grace, with the substance of Newtonian science and the moral and political insights of Rousseau.