Skip to main content
21 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 2, 2015 at 20:58 comment added user9166 @CortAmmon From some kind of positivist point of view, that should be what they mean. But in reality, very few people mean that, when they say this. They usually mean that the effect upon them of acting otherwise would be too negative -- that all choices are foreclosed by forces they dare not oppose. The counterargument just means that measure of the effect is subjective and often wrong. Not accepting the bias implicit in overestimating the cost to oneself is the "bad faith".
Nov 2, 2015 at 20:03 answer added Guill timeline score: 0
Oct 30, 2015 at 18:42 answer added Mozibur Ullah timeline score: 0
Oct 30, 2015 at 18:16 comment added Cort Ammon I'd have to reword your question for this to be an answer, but: It is common English usage to say "I don't have a choice" when what is actually meant is "None of the choices I can make will have an empirically observable effect on the outcome." The contrary argument, leading to "You always have a choice" stems from the argument that, while others may be only looking at things you cannot control, the most important things to "yourself" are always under your control (which, itself leads to some interesting circular patterns in the logic)
Oct 30, 2015 at 17:55 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPhilosophy/status/660153184783097856
Oct 30, 2015 at 17:12 answer added Chris Sunami timeline score: 5
Oct 30, 2015 at 16:34 history reopened Chris Sunami
Mozibur Ullah
John Am
user2953
Alexander S King
Oct 30, 2015 at 14:26 comment added Mozibur Ullah I voted to re-open.
Oct 30, 2015 at 14:16 review Reopen votes
Oct 30, 2015 at 16:34
Oct 30, 2015 at 13:58 comment added Chris Sunami I think the question just seemed unclear because of the language issues. I have edited for clarity (following JohnAm's lead) and nominated for reopening.
S Oct 30, 2015 at 13:56 history edited Chris Sunami CC BY-SA 3.0
clarified the question
S Oct 30, 2015 at 13:56 history suggested John Am CC BY-SA 3.0
Corrected the syntax
Oct 30, 2015 at 8:39 review Suggested edits
S Oct 30, 2015 at 13:56
Oct 30, 2015 at 8:28 history closed James Kingsbery
user2953
jeroenk
virmaior
Needs details or clarity
Oct 30, 2015 at 4:42 review Close votes
Oct 30, 2015 at 8:31
Oct 30, 2015 at 4:34 history edited Vanessa CC BY-SA 3.0
added 155 characters in body
Oct 30, 2015 at 4:24 comment added James Kingsbery Welcome to Philosophy.SE! There are lots of questions here about free-will and determinism: can you make your question more specific about what you're trying to understand?
Oct 30, 2015 at 3:39 history edited Vanessa CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Oct 30, 2015 at 3:39 history edited Alexander S King CC BY-SA 3.0
added 3 characters in body; edited title
Oct 30, 2015 at 3:17 review First posts
Oct 30, 2015 at 4:24
Oct 30, 2015 at 3:14 history asked Vanessa CC BY-SA 3.0