The Stack Overflow podcast is back! Listen to an interview with our new CEO.
2 grammar and rephrasing for clarity
source | link

toTo get along with me, you need respect my religion no more nor less than iI respect your irreligion. you You should check out who Dawkins, et. al., are so you know what Alexander King is referring to.

ifIf we let each other bring up our kids, within societal norms, but with respect to our own world view, we'll get along. if one If some of us forcesforce the otherothers to rear the other'sothers' kids in accordance to ourtheir own world view, we won't get along. we We need to respect each other's world views at least to that extent.

whatWhat are those "societal norms"? they They vary with societies and some societies are nasty and oppressive. but But if someone's supposed religion requires or excuses some practice like human sacrifice or even adults using kids for sex, iI don't give a shit aboutcare what they think about their religion, iI am for the State intervening. to that extent, iI do not respect their religion.

inIn a pluralistic society, it can be sometimes hard to come to a consensus regarding what domains of activity are protected and what are not. i I feel we do pretty well in the U.S., but had not always done so well. religious Religious pacifists were not granted space to practice their pacifism until the mid 20th century (WW2). even Even today there are issues regarding parochial schooling and the State's interest in accreditation.

thereThere are religions, even various quasi-Christian denominations, that iI do not fully respect. but i But I respect them enough to agree to disagree peacefully and to provide mutual dignity.

to get along with me, you need respect my religion no more nor less than i respect your irreligion. you should check out who Dawkins, et. al. are so you know what Alexander King is referring to.

if we let each other bring up our kids, within societal norms, but with respect to our own world view, we'll get along. if one of us forces the other to rear the other's kids in accordance to our own world view, we won't get along. we need to respect each other's world views at least to that extent.

what are those "societal norms"? they vary with societies and some societies are nasty and oppressive. but if someone's supposed religion requires or excuses some practice like human sacrifice or even adults using kids for sex, i don't give a shit about what they think about their religion, i am for the State intervening. to that extent, i do not respect their religion.

in a pluralistic society, it can be sometimes hard to come to a consensus regarding what domains of activity are protected and what are not. i feel we do pretty well in the U.S., but had not always done so well. religious pacifists were not granted space to practice their pacifism until the mid 20th century (WW2). even today there are issues regarding parochial schooling and the State's interest in accreditation.

there are religions, even various quasi-Christian denominations, that i do not fully respect. but i respect them enough to agree to disagree peacefully and to provide mutual dignity.

To get along with me, you need respect my religion no more nor less than I respect your irreligion. You should check out who Dawkins, et. al., are so you know what Alexander King is referring to.

If we let each other bring up our kids, within societal norms, but with respect to our own world view, we'll get along. If some of us force the others to rear the others' kids in accordance to their own world view, we won't get along. We need to respect each other's world views at least to that extent.

What are those "societal norms"? They vary with societies and some societies are nasty and oppressive. But if someone's supposed religion requires or excuses some practice like human sacrifice or even adults using kids for sex, I don't care what they think about their religion, I am for the State intervening. to that extent, I do not respect their religion.

In a pluralistic society, it can be sometimes hard to come to a consensus regarding what domains of activity are protected and what are not. I feel we do pretty well in the U.S., but had not always done so well. Religious pacifists were not granted space to practice their pacifism until the mid 20th century (WW2). Even today there are issues regarding parochial schooling and the State's interest in accreditation.

There are religions, even various quasi-Christian denominations, that I do not fully respect. But I respect them enough to agree to disagree peacefully and to provide mutual dignity.

1
source | link

to get along with me, you need respect my religion no more nor less than i respect your irreligion. you should check out who Dawkins, et. al. are so you know what Alexander King is referring to.

if we let each other bring up our kids, within societal norms, but with respect to our own world view, we'll get along. if one of us forces the other to rear the other's kids in accordance to our own world view, we won't get along. we need to respect each other's world views at least to that extent.

what are those "societal norms"? they vary with societies and some societies are nasty and oppressive. but if someone's supposed religion requires or excuses some practice like human sacrifice or even adults using kids for sex, i don't give a shit about what they think about their religion, i am for the State intervening. to that extent, i do not respect their religion.

in a pluralistic society, it can be sometimes hard to come to a consensus regarding what domains of activity are protected and what are not. i feel we do pretty well in the U.S., but had not always done so well. religious pacifists were not granted space to practice their pacifism until the mid 20th century (WW2). even today there are issues regarding parochial schooling and the State's interest in accreditation.

there are religions, even various quasi-Christian denominations, that i do not fully respect. but i respect them enough to agree to disagree peacefully and to provide mutual dignity.