Timeline for What particular problem in Popper's falsificationism does Kuhn's approach to the demarcation problem solve?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2016 at 5:23 | vote | accept | Alexander S King | ||
| Nov 18, 2015 at 10:13 | comment | added | Mauro ALLEGRANZA | I think not; see Thomas Kuhn, Revolutionary paradigms: Thomas Kuhn on incommensurability and Scientific Revolutions. | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 23:17 | answer | added | Conifold | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 21:38 | answer | added | user9166 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 20:34 | comment | added | Alexander S King | My understanding was that he set out to study the history of science but ended up addressing the demarcation problem because of that. | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 19:42 | comment | added | Mauro ALLEGRANZA | Kuhn's approach is not primarily (or at all) concerned with "demarcation". | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 17:55 | history | asked | Alexander S King | CC BY-SA 3.0 |