3 corr. word
source | link

Voting is not a method that produces truth; it is a decision taking procedure that minimizes resentment.

There is however a statistical reason that supports the procedure. In large samples fluctuations decrease, so it takes a relatively smaller fewer number of experts to turn the vote on the right answer.

A very crude example: If you have 100 random yes/no answers, they will be divided most probably somewhere in the 40-60 interval, so 20 non-random opinions are need to produce the right answer. A 1000 random yes/no will fall most probably in the 470-530 interval, so 60 experts are needed.

Voting is not a method that produces truth; it is a decision taking procedure that minimizes resentment.

There is however a statistical reason that supports the procedure. In large samples fluctuations decrease, so it takes a relatively fewer number of experts to turn the vote on the right answer.

A very crude example: If you have 100 random yes/no answers, they will be divided most probably somewhere in the 40-60 interval, so 20 non-random opinions are need to produce the right answer. A 1000 random yes/no will fall most probably in the 470-530 interval, so 60 experts are needed.

Voting is not a method that produces truth; it is a decision taking procedure that minimizes resentment.

There is however a statistical reason that supports the procedure. In large samples fluctuations decrease, so it takes a relatively smaller number of experts to turn the vote on the right answer.

A very crude example: If you have 100 random yes/no answers, they will be divided most probably somewhere in the 40-60 interval, so 20 non-random opinions are need to produce the right answer. A 1000 random yes/no will fall most probably in the 470-530 interval, so 60 experts are needed.

2 Copy edited.
source | link

Voting is not a method thatthat produces truth; it is a decision taking procedure that minimizes resentment. There

There is however a statistical reason that supports the procedure. In large samples fluctuations decrease, so it takes a relativelyrelatively fewer number of experts to turn the vote on the right answer. A

A very crude example: ifIf you have 100 random yes/no answers, they will be divided most probably somewhere in the 40-60 interval, so 20 non-random opinions are need to produce the right answer. A 1000 random yes/no will fall most probably in the 470-530 interval, so 60 experts are needed.

Voting is not method that produces truth; it is a decision taking procedure that minimizes resentment. There is however a statistical reason that supports the procedure. In large samples fluctuations decrease, so it takes a relatively fewer number of experts to turn the vote on the right answer. A very crude example: if you have 100 random yes/no answers they will be divided most probably somewhere in the 40-60 interval, so 20 non-random opinions are need to produce the right answer. A 1000 random yes/no will fall most probably in the 470-530 interval, so 60 experts are needed.

Voting is not a method that produces truth; it is a decision taking procedure that minimizes resentment.

There is however a statistical reason that supports the procedure. In large samples fluctuations decrease, so it takes a relatively fewer number of experts to turn the vote on the right answer.

A very crude example: If you have 100 random yes/no answers, they will be divided most probably somewhere in the 40-60 interval, so 20 non-random opinions are need to produce the right answer. A 1000 random yes/no will fall most probably in the 470-530 interval, so 60 experts are needed.

1
source | link

Voting is not method that produces truth; it is a decision taking procedure that minimizes resentment. There is however a statistical reason that supports the procedure. In large samples fluctuations decrease, so it takes a relatively fewer number of experts to turn the vote on the right answer. A very crude example: if you have 100 random yes/no answers they will be divided most probably somewhere in the 40-60 interval, so 20 non-random opinions are need to produce the right answer. A 1000 random yes/no will fall most probably in the 470-530 interval, so 60 experts are needed.