Skip to main content
edited title
Link
virmaior
  • 25k
  • 3
  • 50
  • 108

Sleeping In the "Sleeping beauty problemproblem", would Elga's answer change if it's 7 days instead of 2?

added 3 characters in body
Source Link
gnasher729
  • 5.8k
  • 12
  • 18

Consider this Sleeping Beauty-like scenario: Some researchers are going to put Sleeping Beauty to sleep. During the seven days that the experiment will last, they will brietrie yto wake her up either once or seven times, depending on the toss of a fair coin (Heads: once; Tails: seven times). After each waking, they will put her to back to sleep with a drug that makes her forget that waking. When she is rstfirst awakened, to what degree ought she to believe that the outcome of the coin toss is Heads?

If we follow Elga's reasoning what is the answer here? Give some justication.

Considering Elga answers in the case of tails having her woken up 2 times, he says probabilites are 1/3, I think he'd answer 1/8 in this case as P(H on day 1)=P(T on day 1) and P(T on day 1)=P(T on day 2)=...=P(T on day 7).

Therefore, overall there are 8 options and with no room for discrimination he'd assign 1/8 to each. Is this reasoning correct?

Consider this Sleeping Beauty-like scenario: Some researchers are going to put Sleeping Beauty to sleep. During the seven days that the experiment will last, they will brie y wake her up either once or seven times, depending on the toss of a fair coin (Heads: once; Tails: seven times). After each waking, they will put her to back to sleep with a drug that makes her forget that waking. When she is rst awakened, to what degree ought she to believe that the outcome of the coin toss is Heads?

If we follow Elga's reasoning what is the answer here? Give some justication.

Considering Elga answers in the case of tails having her woken up 2 times, he says probabilites are 1/3, I think he'd answer 1/8 in this case as P(H on day 1)=P(T on day 1) and P(T on day 1)=P(T on day 2)=...=P(T on day 7).

Therefore, overall there are 8 options and with no room for discrimination he'd assign 1/8 to each. Is this reasoning correct?

Consider this Sleeping Beauty-like scenario: Some researchers are going to put Sleeping Beauty to sleep. During the seven days that the experiment will last, they will trie to wake her up either once or seven times, depending on the toss of a fair coin (Heads: once; Tails: seven times). After each waking, they will put her to back to sleep with a drug that makes her forget that waking. When she is first awakened, to what degree ought she to believe that the outcome of the coin toss is Heads?

If we follow Elga's reasoning what is the answer here? Give some justication.

Considering Elga answers in the case of tails having her woken up 2 times, he says probabilites are 1/3, I think he'd answer 1/8 in this case as P(H on day 1)=P(T on day 1) and P(T on day 1)=P(T on day 2)=...=P(T on day 7).

Therefore, overall there are 8 options and with no room for discrimination he'd assign 1/8 to each. Is this reasoning correct?

Post Reopened by Joseph Weissman
Post Closed as "Not suitable for this site" by Joseph Weissman
Tweeted twitter.com/StackPhilosophy/status/673829114101571587
added 77 characters in body
Source Link
virmaior
  • 25k
  • 3
  • 50
  • 108

Consider this Sleeping Beauty-like scenario: Some researchers are going to put Sleeping Beauty to sleep. During the seven days that the experiment will last, they will brie y wake her up either once or seven times, depending on the toss of a fair coin (Heads: once; Tails: seven times). After each waking, they will put her to back to sleep with a drug that makes her forget that waking. When she is rstrst awakened, to what degree ought she to believe that the outcome of the coin toss is Heads?

If we follow Elga's reasoningElga's reasoning what is the answer here? Give some justi cationjustication.

Considering Elga answers in the case of tails having her woken up 2 times, he says probabilites are 1/3, I think he'd answer 1/8 in this case as P(H on day 1)=P(T on day 1) and P(T on day 1)=P(T on day 2)=...=P(T on day 7).

Therefore, overall there are 8 options and with no room for discrimination he'd assign 1/8 to each. Is this reasoning correct?

Consider this Sleeping Beauty-like scenario: Some researchers are going to put Sleeping Beauty to sleep. During the seven days that the experiment will last, they will brie y wake her up either once or seven times, depending on the toss of a fair coin (Heads: once; Tails: seven times). After each waking, they will put her to back to sleep with a drug that makes her forget that waking. When she is rst awakened, to what degree ought she to believe that the outcome of the coin toss is Heads?

If we follow Elga's reasoning what is the answer here? Give some justi cation.

Considering Elga answers in the case of tails having her woken up 2 times, he says probabilites are 1/3, I think he'd answer 1/8 in this case as P(H on day 1)=P(T on day 1) and P(T on day 1)=P(T on day 2)=...=P(T on day 7).

Therefore, overall there are 8 options and with no room for discrimination he'd assign 1/8 to each. Is this reasoning correct?

Consider this Sleeping Beauty-like scenario: Some researchers are going to put Sleeping Beauty to sleep. During the seven days that the experiment will last, they will brie y wake her up either once or seven times, depending on the toss of a fair coin (Heads: once; Tails: seven times). After each waking, they will put her to back to sleep with a drug that makes her forget that waking. When she is rst awakened, to what degree ought she to believe that the outcome of the coin toss is Heads?

If we follow Elga's reasoning what is the answer here? Give some justication.

Considering Elga answers in the case of tails having her woken up 2 times, he says probabilites are 1/3, I think he'd answer 1/8 in this case as P(H on day 1)=P(T on day 1) and P(T on day 1)=P(T on day 2)=...=P(T on day 7).

Therefore, overall there are 8 options and with no room for discrimination he'd assign 1/8 to each. Is this reasoning correct?

Source Link
Loading