Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 9 at 12:54 history edited user80226
edited tags; edited tags
Dec 16, 2018 at 10:41 comment added user20253 This topic is so muddled in modern philosophy that it seems hardly worth examining. In my view 'naturalism' should be the idea that all phenomena are natural, but as it is you're right and naturalists usually assume physicalism is true. I have no idea why this is and it reduces the usefulness of the word 'naturalism' to zero much as you suggest. It is not up to physicists to dogmatically declare what is natural and what is not but they like to do it anyway. It seems to me a lot of philosophy might as well be politics.
Dec 15, 2018 at 18:32 answer added Dcleve timeline score: 2
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:42 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://philosophy.stackexchange.com/ with https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/
Apr 20, 2016 at 1:16 history edited Conifold
edited tags
Jan 28, 2016 at 22:18 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPhilosophy/status/692834170591010816
Jan 28, 2016 at 21:22 comment added nir @sand1, right, but that is not necessarily related - take a look at the SEP article on physicalism, where the author discusses what it means for something to be physical - plato.stanford.edu/entries/physicalism/#UndPhyInt
Jan 28, 2016 at 21:10 history edited Alexander S King CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body
Jan 28, 2016 at 21:08 answer added Conifold timeline score: 5
Jan 28, 2016 at 20:42 comment added sand1 'Physis' is Greek for 'nature', isnt it?
Jan 28, 2016 at 20:05 history edited Alexander S King CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Jan 28, 2016 at 19:25 history edited Alexander S King CC BY-SA 3.0
added 3 characters in body
Jan 28, 2016 at 19:14 history asked Alexander S King CC BY-SA 3.0