Timeline for What are the problems with reductionism?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2016 at 22:16 | answer | added | Mozibur Ullah | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 6, 2016 at 5:07 | vote | accept | Apodictic Apple Juice | ||
| Jul 6, 2016 at 5:07 | vote | accept | Apodictic Apple Juice | ||
| Jul 6, 2016 at 5:07 | |||||
| Jul 5, 2016 at 22:14 | vote | accept | Apodictic Apple Juice | ||
| Jul 5, 2016 at 22:14 | |||||
| Jul 5, 2016 at 21:49 | comment | added | Conifold | For natural phenomena - immense technical complexity, even chemistry is not reduced to quantum physics at present, for mental and social phenomena, aside from that exponentiated, the apparently unbridgeable semantic gap. Inert third person descriptions of "facts" about "primary substance" can not by themselves produce either "what it is like" first person awareness, or normative and teleological "ought to be"-s that social interaction is full of. If reductionism is possible at all conceptual tools would have to advance well beyond symbolic third person models that we use today. | |
| Jul 5, 2016 at 18:32 | answer | added | user9166 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 5, 2016 at 12:59 | answer | added | Chris Sunami | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 5, 2016 at 5:04 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhilosophy/status/750193638878089216 | ||
| Jul 5, 2016 at 3:10 | answer | added | Chris Sunami | timeline score: -2 | |
| Jul 4, 2016 at 23:49 | comment | added | Joseph Weissman♦ | There are Devils in the details of many apparently successful intertheoretic "reductions" -- Batterman is very good here, but see also the recent "Reductionism, Emergence and Levels of Reality" | |
| Jul 4, 2016 at 22:09 | answer | added | Cort Ammon | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 4, 2016 at 21:03 | history | asked | Apodictic Apple Juice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |