Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackPhilosophy/status/1212841005260652544
edited tags
Link
Conifold
  • 44.2k
  • 4
  • 98
  • 185
edited tags; edited title
Link
Conifold
  • 44.2k
  • 4
  • 98
  • 185

Where can I find a discussion of what What makes Leibniz's definition of perfection unintelligible?

deleted 3 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Conifold
  • 44.2k
  • 4
  • 98
  • 185

Where can I find a discussion of what makes Leibniz's definition of perfection unintelligible?

Leibniz defined a perfection as a simple, positive quality in the highest degree.

Norman Malcolm says

I do not find his definition definition of a perfection intelligible. For one thing, it assumes that that certain qualities or attributes are "positive" in their intrinsic nature, and others "negative" or "privative," and I have not been able clearly to understand that. For another thing, it assumes that some qualities are intrinsically simple

I'd very much like to see a discussion about this definition and about the objections that Malcolm mentions but I haven't been able to find one. Are there any recommended articles or books about this topic?

Leibniz's definition of perfection

Leibniz defined a perfection as a simple, positive quality in the highest degree.

Norman Malcolm says

I do not find his definition of a perfection intelligible. For one thing, it assumes that certain qualities or attributes are "positive" in their intrinsic nature, and others "negative" or "privative," and I have not been able clearly to understand that. For another thing, it assumes that some qualities are intrinsically simple

I'd very much like to see a discussion about this definition and about the objections that Malcolm mentions but I haven't been able to find one. Are there any recommended articles or books about this topic?

Where can I find a discussion of what makes Leibniz's definition of perfection unintelligible?

Leibniz defined a perfection as a simple, positive quality in the highest degree.

Norman Malcolm says

I do not find his definition of a perfection intelligible. For one thing, it assumes that certain qualities or attributes are "positive" in their intrinsic nature, and others "negative" or "privative," and I have not been able clearly to understand that. For another thing, it assumes that some qualities are intrinsically simple

I'd very much like to see a discussion about this definition and about the objections that Malcolm mentions but I haven't been able to find one. Are there any recommended articles or books about this topic?

Source Link
MCL
  • 143
  • 2
Loading