Timeline for Is there a valid argument for a moral imperative to seek knowledge?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2017 at 23:46 | answer | added | Mark Rosenblitt-Janssen | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 28, 2016 at 19:03 | history | edited | Chris Sunami |
amended tags
|
|
| Sep 28, 2016 at 18:40 | answer | added | user9166 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 28, 2016 at 9:46 | answer | added | user22791 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 28, 2016 at 9:38 | answer | added | Mr Durden | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 28, 2016 at 0:27 | comment | added | Philip Klöcking♦ | There is a moral duty to develop your gifts of nature as best as you can for Kant, so I would definitely say yes. Probably I will look the passages up eventually, but first I have to get some sleep and a presentation to be held ;) | |
| Sep 28, 2016 at 0:23 | comment | added | Conifold | See Virtue Epistemology on SEP:"Virtue responsibilists (e.g. Code, Hookway, Montmarquet, Zagzebski) understand intellectual virtues to include refined character traits such as conscientiousness and open-mindedness" plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-virtue | |
| Sep 28, 2016 at 0:16 | history | asked | Wes Doyle | CC BY-SA 3.0 |