Skip to main content

Timeline for Limitless Space

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

27 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 28, 2018 at 21:07 answer added David Thornley timeline score: 1
Sep 26, 2018 at 22:57 answer added CriglCragl timeline score: 0
Sep 25, 2018 at 19:42 answer added RodolfoAP timeline score: 0
S Sep 25, 2018 at 15:29 history suggested Glorfindel CC BY-SA 4.0
typos corrected
Sep 25, 2018 at 9:31 review Suggested edits
S Sep 25, 2018 at 15:29
Jul 22, 2018 at 13:16 answer added john Hobsonohn_a_ timeline score: 2
Jul 21, 2018 at 10:37 answer added user20253 timeline score: 0
S Sep 29, 2017 at 18:37 history suggested kenorb CC BY-SA 3.0
Improves readability.
Sep 29, 2017 at 11:48 review Suggested edits
S Sep 29, 2017 at 18:37
Sep 29, 2017 at 2:45 answer added Mozibur Ullah timeline score: 5
S Sep 29, 2017 at 0:09 history edited Luís Henrique CC BY-SA 3.0
Improves grammar.
S Sep 29, 2017 at 0:09 history suggested kenorb CC BY-SA 3.0
Improves grammar.
Sep 28, 2017 at 10:52 review Suggested edits
S Sep 29, 2017 at 0:09
Sep 28, 2017 at 8:22 answer added Bryan Aneux timeline score: 3
Sep 28, 2017 at 3:58 answer added Rich Guidicini timeline score: 2
Dec 28, 2016 at 16:20 answer added oW_ timeline score: 2
Dec 27, 2016 at 19:47 answer added Lothrop Stoddard timeline score: 1
Dec 27, 2016 at 1:01 answer added Guill timeline score: 3
S Dec 26, 2016 at 20:25 history mod moved comments to chat
S Dec 26, 2016 at 20:25 comment added commando Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
Dec 26, 2016 at 12:12 comment added Euler_Salter @Mr.Kennedy I apologise for the bad writing! What you say is true. However what I would like to emphazise is not one of the two options, but rather the fact that I guess only one of them should be true as they are opposite of each other,however both seem to lead to contraddictions! Unless there is some weird properties where the space can be both finite and infinite at the same time,maybe for some law of physics that work only for massively big objects like the universe itself.
Dec 26, 2016 at 9:49 comment added user3017 I don't think it makes sense to speak of the properties of space without establishing some basis for which things may be predicated of it. I suspect that in practice, whatever definition that is employed presupposes an independent spatial framework within which space is thought to exist, i.e. space within space.
Dec 26, 2016 at 9:29 comment added John Am There are no Infinite sets.
Dec 26, 2016 at 7:11 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPhilosophy/status/813280994753183744
Dec 26, 2016 at 3:27 comment added MmmHmm "repeat it to infinity" (as if infinity were a place itself, or a number) vs "repeat it infinitely" (as in a process that can continue indefinitely) - in either case, no one lives long enough to do anything infinitely nor does anyone walk anywhere by first walking exactly half way there (like a "point" - where exactly is "halfway"??) . Purportedly Diogenes simply got up and walked away when he heard Zeno's paradox... You can concluse all sorts of stuff from any old supposition.
Dec 26, 2016 at 2:59 review First posts
Dec 30, 2016 at 6:50
Dec 26, 2016 at 2:59 history asked Euler_Salter CC BY-SA 3.0