2 Tagged the question
| link
    Post Migrated Here from english.stackexchange.com
1
source | link

Name for the logical fallacy of asking for unreasonable amount of sources?

The fallacy is when someone demands either an impossible source or their criteria for accepting a source as believable is impossible to meet.

Example:

"Driving stoned is dangerous and you should not do it."

"Unless you can can produce a peer reviewed, double blind study that conclusively proves it to be unsafe then it must be safe."