3 grammar
source | link

Is imminent Can the immediate effect of thea cause can be considered a part of the cause? If not, why?

I was wondering wondering whether heat from thea fire can be considered a part of the fire (heat will definitely exist meremerely in the presence of fire) or? Or, whether sunlight can be considered a part of the sun (sunlight will definitely exist meremerely in the presence of the sun)?

So I came up with the question whether an effect, which is doomed to exist due to the mere existence of the cause, can be considered a part of the cause? If not, why?

Is imminent effect of the cause can be considered a part of the cause? If not, why?

I was wondering wondering whether heat from the fire can be considered a part of fire (heat will definitely exist mere in the presence of fire) or sunlight can be considered a part of sun (sunlight will definitely exist mere in the presence of sun)?

So I came up with the question whether an effect which is doomed to exist due to mere existence of cause can be considered a part of cause? If not, why?

Can the immediate effect of a cause be considered a part of the cause? If not, why?

I was wondering whether heat from a fire can be considered part of the fire (heat will definitely exist merely in the presence of fire)? Or, whether sunlight can be considered part of the sun (sunlight will definitely exist merely in the presence of the sun)?

So I came up with the question whether an effect, which is doomed to exist due to the mere existence of the cause, can be considered part of the cause? If not, why?

2 deleted 1 character in body
source | link

I was wondering wondering whether heat from the fire can be considered a part of fire (heat will definitely exist mere in the presence of fire) or sunlight can be considered a part of sun (sunlight will definitely exist mere in the presence of firesun)?

So I came up with the question whether an effect which is doomed to exist due to mere existence of cause can be considered a part of cause? If not, why?

I was wondering wondering whether heat from the fire can be considered a part of fire (heat will definitely exist mere in the presence of fire) or sunlight can be considered a part of sun (sunlight will definitely exist mere in the presence of fire)?

So I came up with the question whether an effect which is doomed to exist due to mere existence of cause can be considered a part of cause? If not, why?

I was wondering wondering whether heat from the fire can be considered a part of fire (heat will definitely exist mere in the presence of fire) or sunlight can be considered a part of sun (sunlight will definitely exist mere in the presence of sun)?

So I came up with the question whether an effect which is doomed to exist due to mere existence of cause can be considered a part of cause? If not, why?

1
source | link

Is imminent effect of the cause can be considered a part of the cause? If not, why?

I was wondering wondering whether heat from the fire can be considered a part of fire (heat will definitely exist mere in the presence of fire) or sunlight can be considered a part of sun (sunlight will definitely exist mere in the presence of fire)?

So I came up with the question whether an effect which is doomed to exist due to mere existence of cause can be considered a part of cause? If not, why?