2 deleted 1 character in body
source | link

I would call it a Hasty Refutation: rejecting a general claim on the basis of a single or small counterexamplea few cases that seem to go against that claim.

itIt is the refutation counterpart to the Hasty Generalization, where you point to just one or a handful of cases to justify a general claim. We would be making the fallacy of Hasty Generalization when we say: "ALook"Look at the warm weather we've been having over the past 3 days: must be global warming!"

I would call it a Hasty Refutation: rejecting a general claim on the basis of a single or small counterexample.

it is the refutation counterpart to the Hasty Generalization, where you point to just one or a handful of cases to justify a general claim. We would be making the fallacy of Hasty Generalization when we say: "ALook at the warm weather we've been having over the past 3 days: must be global warming!"

I would call it a Hasty Refutation: rejecting a general claim on the basis of a single or a few cases that seem to go against that claim.

It is the refutation counterpart to the Hasty Generalization, where you point to just one or a handful of cases to justify a general claim. We would be making the fallacy of Hasty Generalization when we say: "Look at the warm weather we've been having over the past 3 days: must be global warming!"

1
source | link

I would call it a Hasty Refutation: rejecting a general claim on the basis of a single or small counterexample.

it is the refutation counterpart to the Hasty Generalization, where you point to just one or a handful of cases to justify a general claim. We would be making the fallacy of Hasty Generalization when we say: "ALook at the warm weather we've been having over the past 3 days: must be global warming!"