Tweeted twitter.com/StackPhilosophy/status/1061453827969376257
3 spelling
source | link

In my view scientists make experiments and get results. Then, usually they interpreteinterpret these results (theories). We may agree that experiments' results are objective, at least if thethey are reproducible. So what is the reason to consider that science is not objective?

In my view scientists make experiments and get results. Then, usually they interprete these results (theories). We may agree that experiments' results are objective, at least if the are reproducible. So what is the reason to consider that science is not objective?

In my view scientists make experiments and get results. Then, usually they interpret these results (theories). We may agree that experiments' results are objective, at least if they are reproducible. So what is the reason to consider that science is not objective?

2 deleted 145 characters in body
source | link

In my view scientists make experiments and get results. Then, usually they interprete these results (theories). Is there anyWe may agree that experiments' results are objective, at least if the are reproducible. So what is the reason to consider that science is not objective?

I've gone across standford encyclopaedia and wikipedia, but I don't see strong reasons to state that.


I must admit I have no citations but the statement "science is not objective" is quite common on these times.

In my view scientists make experiments and get results. Then, usually they interprete these results (theories). Is there any reason to consider that science is not objective?

I've gone across standford encyclopaedia and wikipedia, but I don't see strong reasons to state that.


I must admit I have no citations but the statement "science is not objective" is quite common on these times.

In my view scientists make experiments and get results. Then, usually they interprete these results (theories). We may agree that experiments' results are objective, at least if the are reproducible. So what is the reason to consider that science is not objective?

1
source | link

Objectivity in science

In my view scientists make experiments and get results. Then, usually they interprete these results (theories). Is there any reason to consider that science is not objective?

I've gone across standford encyclopaedia and wikipedia, but I don't see strong reasons to state that.


I must admit I have no citations but the statement "science is not objective" is quite common on these times.