Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 8, 2019 at 1:15 comment added Hierarchist @dave, all darwinian life stems from a shared ancestor. This means a "loss" via darwinian competition is still infinitely better that never having played because at least a distant relative of yours "won". It'n why it's a "win" for me to die to save my family. Only in this case the family is all life on earth.
Dec 7, 2019 at 18:09 comment added dave @Hierarchist And when you say “a valuator outside darwinism”... yes, I am very interested in that.
Dec 7, 2019 at 18:07 comment added dave @Hierarchist Just to check.. zero-sum meaning there has to be losers for there to be winners, and, non-zero-sum meaning everyone wins? I agree the winners would value this, but my proposition is that it’s at the expense of the losers.
Dec 6, 2019 at 14:14 comment added Hierarchist @dave, you're confused. Darwinism has intrinsic value because through its process, it creates valuators who give Darwinism value. Just that alone means Darwinism is not zerosum because the final outcome is positive. You're asking for extrinsic value now, you're looking for a valuator outside this Darwinism. There are solutions to that, but it's a completely different argument.
Dec 5, 2019 at 19:16 comment added dave @Hierarchist Totally, but that’s just in the macro case. When that same cycle occurs indefinitely and yields no positive externality, that’s when it starts to look zero sum.
Dec 4, 2019 at 17:25 comment added Hierarchist Darwinian life is not zero sum. If I suffer and die to save my family, that's positive sum.
Jan 4, 2019 at 6:16 comment added christo183 see also: philosophy.stackexchange.com/q/56011/33787
Jan 4, 2019 at 5:15 review First posts
Jan 4, 2019 at 6:17
Jan 4, 2019 at 5:10 history answered dave CC BY-SA 4.0