Timeline for How does Logic define "true" and "false"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2013 at 3:56 | history | edited | Mark Rosenblitt-Janssen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 207 characters in body
|
| Feb 15, 2013 at 4:49 | comment | added | Dennis | While I think you are right to point out that calling "True" and "False" "axiomatic expressions" is a bit confused, I have my doubts about the accuracy of your description. The "(potential) results" of a "compatible logical grammar" doesn't seem to accurately describe "truth" and "falsity", at least it doesn't do so with any level of clarity. More commonly they are referred to as "truth-values" or "semantic values". Additionally, your final paragraph seems to be baseless speculation about the reasons behind OP's question. I think an edit is needed to clarify your answer. | |
| Feb 15, 2013 at 2:56 | history | edited | Mark Rosenblitt-Janssen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
meantioned the definition of the words, as per the quesiton.
|
| Feb 15, 2013 at 2:16 | history | edited | Mark Rosenblitt-Janssen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 41 characters in body
|
| Feb 15, 2013 at 2:08 | history | answered | Mark Rosenblitt-Janssen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |