Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhilosophy/status/303494135246098432
2 edited body; edited title
source | link

Was Kants reductionformulation of mathematics as synthetic a priori a forerunner to the Russellian campaign to reduce mathematics to logic?

Kant showed that mathematics was synthetic a priori. For example the laws of arithmaticarithmetic or of euclidean geometry, and noted that this had escaped the notice of previous thinkers, they had assumed them to be analytic a priori.

Can the Russelian campaign be seen as an attempt to refound mathematics analytically - that is solely on the laws of logic - by excluding the synthetic excess and retaining an analytic core?

Was Kants reduction of mathematics a forerunner to the Russellian campaign to reduce mathematics to logic?

Kant showed that mathematics was synthetic a priori. For example the laws of arithmatic or of euclidean geometry, and noted that this had escaped the notice of previous thinkers, they had assumed them to be analytic a priori.

Can the Russelian campaign be seen as an attempt to refound mathematics analytically - that is solely on the laws of logic - by excluding the synthetic excess and retaining an analytic core?

Was Kants formulation of mathematics as synthetic a priori a forerunner to the Russellian campaign to reduce mathematics to logic?

Kant showed that mathematics was synthetic a priori. For example the laws of arithmetic or of euclidean geometry, and noted that this had escaped the notice of previous thinkers, they had assumed them to be analytic a priori.

Can the Russelian campaign be seen as an attempt to refound mathematics analytically - that is solely on the laws of logic - by excluding the synthetic excess and retaining an analytic core?

1
source | link

Was Kants reduction of mathematics a forerunner to the Russellian campaign to reduce mathematics to logic?

Kant showed that mathematics was synthetic a priori. For example the laws of arithmatic or of euclidean geometry, and noted that this had escaped the notice of previous thinkers, they had assumed them to be analytic a priori.

Can the Russelian campaign be seen as an attempt to refound mathematics analytically - that is solely on the laws of logic - by excluding the synthetic excess and retaining an analytic core?