Timeline for A Popper question about corroboration
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2017 at 8:30 | answer | added | alanf | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 8, 2017 at 9:39 | answer | added | Xaqron | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 19, 2013 at 12:50 | answer | added | kevluv97 | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 1, 2013 at 16:31 | answer | added | ntett | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 24, 2013 at 1:55 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhilosophy/status/326877094757933059 | ||
| Apr 23, 2013 at 16:03 | comment | added | user3306 | I don't have the book so I was hoping someone understood Miller's point. | |
| Apr 22, 2013 at 1:30 | comment | added | Annotations | To understand you need to read Miller's book "Critical Rationalism: A Restatement and Defense". Few thinkers today support Popper's corroboration concept. | |
| Apr 21, 2013 at 22:16 | comment | added | DBK | I don't understand it either. It doesn't make much sense (I mean at a purely linguistic level, not wrt philosophical content). | |
| Apr 21, 2013 at 15:58 | history | asked | user3306 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |