Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 6, 2015 at 16:37 comment added gnasher729 @JonEricson: The article that you quote contains one deragotary comment about Gödel, but no actual justification, no actual argument against him. Reading the surrounding sentences, I'd say Mr. Morningstar didn't have a clue what Gödel was about.
Jan 20, 2013 at 10:39 comment added danielm Rubbish. Truth and wisdom are inseparable, questions and truth are inseparable. How could you even ask a meaningful question without beginning from some truth? What meaning does "wisdom" have without reference to some truth? Pseudo-philosophical claims like this (which ultimately degenerate into nihilism, which is the negation of philosophy) remind me of the postmodernist performative contradiction "there is no truth". You're free to believe it, but then you're no longer doing philosophy. And I repeat: consensus is meaningless.
Jun 8, 2011 at 19:09 comment added Jon Ericson My favorite critic of Gödel is: '"Deconstruction" is based on a specialization of the principle, in which a work is interpreted as a statement about itself, using a literary version of the same cheap trick that Kurt Gödel used to try to frighten mathematicians back in the thirties.' From: <fudco.com/chip/deconstr.html>. I think I'll ask a question about that.
Jun 8, 2011 at 1:24 comment added jimjim @Bob : LOL, so what if there is no one ultimate truth, maybe even truth itself is not meant to be what to be aiming for but a step in reaching metatruth.
Jun 7, 2011 at 22:52 history edited Joseph Spiros CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 2 characters in body
Jun 7, 2011 at 22:48 comment added zzzbbx actually Goedel is a heck of a nightmare for those philosopher who thought they could reach the truth :)
Jun 7, 2011 at 22:33 history edited Joseph Spiros CC BY-SA 3.0
added 425 characters in body; added 54 characters in body; deleted 20 characters in body
Jun 7, 2011 at 22:26 history answered Joseph Spiros CC BY-SA 3.0