Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 7, 2021 at 17:56 review Close votes
Oct 14, 2021 at 3:11
Oct 7, 2021 at 17:14 answer added Speakpigeon timeline score: -1
Oct 7, 2021 at 15:04 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jun 9, 2021 at 15:01 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
May 10, 2021 at 14:34 answer added David Thornley timeline score: 2
May 9, 2021 at 17:47 comment added Nelson Alexander I am wondering how one would claim, demonstrate, communicate, or even state these proofs without recourse to the senses? Such appeal to the evidence of the senses is built into the discussion from the very beginning. Or at least this is the "modern" paradigm since roughly Bacon. To prove that God exists by appeal to the authority of the Bible is still an appeal to experience and to the accounts of the experiences of witnesses. It is a matter or how this material "evidence" is to be organized and repeated to provide intuitive agreement. Finding ways to disagree is never a problem.
May 9, 2021 at 16:30 answer added ThisIsMe timeline score: 3
May 9, 2021 at 14:32 comment added CriglCragl Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. While unlikely, the existence of a coexisting unknown hominid in our recent past is possible, though increasingly unlikely in modern mapped & satellited times. There's an account of what seems to have been a woolly rhino being loaded on to a train in Siberia only a century and a half ago - best candidate for unicorns, apparently they scooped waterholes in the steppe that others could drink from, getting their association with purifying waters. Fossils & frozen bodies are extremely rare. The cases remain open.
May 9, 2021 at 11:29 comment added armand "Why would we even assume that the supernatural reality is in concordance with this method?" Why would we assume there is a supernatural reality in the first place? In order for me to assume anything about the supernatural, I would have to first be convinced that it exists. Also I think you are missing the point that you, as a believer, need to convince people of the existence of the supernatural (assuming you want them to believe like you do. But if you don't then why care at all?) you need to provide arguments to change their mind. Telling them they have to prove you are wrong won't work.
May 9, 2021 at 10:24 answer added Just Some Old Man timeline score: 0
May 9, 2021 at 4:15 comment added Swami Vishwananda By definition "super"-natural entities are beyond nature - beyond measurement or observation in the sensual universe. They cannot be proven by scientific means. All 'proofs' lie in the assertion, not in the negation.
May 9, 2021 at 2:11 review First posts
May 23, 2021 at 2:15
May 9, 2021 at 2:08 history asked Khasim Amedu CC BY-SA 4.0