Timeline for Does claiming something exists imply that the number 1 exists?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2022 at 15:02 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 27, 2022 at 3:06 | |||||
| Feb 21, 2022 at 20:26 | answer | added | Longmatey80 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 15, 2015 at 22:14 | answer | added | Mozibur Ullah | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 15, 2015 at 17:49 | answer | added | R. Barzell | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 15, 2015 at 17:01 | answer | added | Nelson Alexander | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 7, 2013 at 12:04 | answer | added | Ben | timeline score: -1 | |
| Jul 26, 2011 at 19:36 | vote | accept | Andrew Stout | ||
| Jul 25, 2011 at 16:07 | answer | added | Mitch | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 25, 2011 at 2:12 | answer | added | Tom Boardman | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 24, 2011 at 21:03 | answer | added | Erin K Carmody | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 24, 2011 at 20:11 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhilosophy/status/95224481152385024 | ||
| Jul 24, 2011 at 19:18 | comment | added | davidlowryduda | @Tom I did not know this tribe, and that's very interesting. Good link. | |
| Jul 24, 2011 at 18:40 | comment | added | Andrew Stout | I am vaguely aware of this tribe. | |
| Jul 24, 2011 at 18:13 | comment | added | Tom Boardman | You may find the lexicon of the amazonian Piraha tribe of interest en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… . To the Piraha, something existing would imply at best only that a small quantity of that thing existed. | |
| Jul 24, 2011 at 18:07 | answer | added | Xodarap | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 24, 2011 at 16:40 | history | reopened | Joseph Weissman♦ | ||
| Jul 24, 2011 at 16:39 | comment | added | Joseph Weissman♦ | Thank you, REX. I would still encourage any clarifying reformulations you may wish to make, but that said I am voting to reopen. | |
| Jul 24, 2011 at 16:38 | comment | added | Andrew Stout | So, I completely changed my question; however, my question is still related to the ontology of numbers. However, I am interested in a specific type of reasoning rather than the question about the ontology of the natural numbers. | |
| Jul 24, 2011 at 16:36 | history | edited | Andrew Stout | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 107 characters in body; edited title
|
| Jul 24, 2011 at 16:13 | comment | added | Andrew Stout | I am asking a more specific question. There seems to be something unique about the number 1 as it pertains to our use in language. I see the word "a" very much like the phrase "to be." | |
| Jul 24, 2011 at 16:07 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
insert duplicate link
|
|
| Jul 24, 2011 at 16:07 | history | closed | Joseph Weissman♦ | exact duplicate | |
| Jul 24, 2011 at 15:55 | history | asked | Andrew Stout | CC BY-SA 3.0 |