Timeline for Is there a resource cataloguing unique and fundamental concepts cross-culturally?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2021 at 6:46 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 23, 2022 at 3:08 | |||||
| Dec 25, 2021 at 9:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhilosophy/status/1474666229952618496 | ||
| S Dec 25, 2021 at 0:55 | history | became hot network question | |||
| S Dec 25, 2021 at 0:55 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Dec 24, 2021 at 22:32 | comment | added | Double Knot | Have you heard of Leibniz's similar project called universal character? a form of pasigraphy, or ideographic language. This was to be based on a rationalised version of the 'principles' of Chinese characters... To achieve your "capture the breadth and depth of knowledge, experience, and communication possibilities" goal, in addition to your etymology, you may need algebraic rules or diagrammatic reasoning (once tried by Leibniz) to organize your syllable atoms. But unlike math, even 1 syllable has tons of meanings in different ways | |
| Dec 24, 2021 at 22:19 | vote | accept | Lance Pollard | ||
| Dec 24, 2021 at 18:59 | comment | added | Joseph Weissman♦ | In passing on the conlang aspects — it strikes me the syllabary-oriented approach makes maximal sense for a “character-oriented language”; maybe consider a root “kernel” of characters and inflections/declensions to get “theme and variation” of meanings | |
| Dec 24, 2021 at 18:14 | history | edited | J D |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 24, 2021 at 18:14 | answer | added | J D | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 24, 2021 at 18:00 | history | edited | J D |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 24, 2021 at 17:50 | history | edited | J D |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 24, 2021 at 17:43 | history | edited | J D | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Dec 24, 2021 at 16:47 | history | asked | Lance Pollard | CC BY-SA 4.0 |