Timeline for What is the most probable AI?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2022 at 6:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhilosophy/status/1552896703984009216 | ||
| Jul 29, 2022 at 2:22 | comment | added | Scott Rowe | Someone I know calls this a "brain loop": a thought that you can't get away from. Put your mind on something else. | |
| Jul 26, 2022 at 14:33 | answer | added | gnasher729 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 26, 2022 at 12:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 26, 2022 at 11:14 | answer | added | wizzwizz4 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 24, 2022 at 22:35 | comment | added | Zeruel017 | I hope soo, I suffer cause of this concept for 6 months, but there never seems to be a definitive answer | |
| Jun 24, 2022 at 16:41 | comment | added | J Kusin | @Zeruel017 we cant refute even basic things. Your ask is simply orders of magnitude too speculative. I’m sure you can find an antidote without a direct answer. | |
| Jun 23, 2022 at 15:14 | comment | added | Zeruel017 | I come to ask others why I remain in doubt if others really exist and if I can broadly refute that Boltzmann's theory of brains is false, I no longer question reality. | |
| Jun 23, 2022 at 8:25 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 29, 2022 at 3:14 | |||||
| Jun 23, 2022 at 6:10 | comment | added | armand | All the objections I have expressed about the boltzmann hypothesis apply to solipsism. If you think we are not real, why do you come to this website asking for our opinion? Are you going to put your money where your mouth is and stop interacting with all the "unreal" people around you? No, you're going to live like the world is real, because otherwise your life is going to be miserable. Any brain time invested on solipsism, Boltzman brain, simulation etc is wasted (save for funny musing). Stop worrying. There are real, impacting problems out there that require your attention. | |
| Jun 23, 2022 at 5:59 | comment | added | Double Knot | Hear the sense you wanna express, maybe more mysterious, even appearances and perhaps the seemingly innately intuitive consciousness do not exist in any sense as claimed in today's another post regarding ontological nihilism which hopefully could inspire you further... | |
| Jun 23, 2022 at 5:02 | comment | added | Zeruel017 | I am concerned that if I am a Boltzmann Brain, others do not really exist, they are not really conscious (solipsism) | |
| Jun 23, 2022 at 3:11 | comment | added | armand | The question is, why care at all? So you might be a boltzman brain or a brain simulated in a boltzman computer. So what? What are you going to do to make sure of it (you can't, because you can trust none of your memories or sensations) and what are you going to do about it (nothing you can do, really)? Your life span might not exceed a few milliseconds, or, you could be a real person and have to plan on sustaining yourself for the next 70 years. In the end, have to go by life providing for the decades to come while handling the possibility you might die tomorrow, like every single real person. | |
| Jun 23, 2022 at 0:23 | history | edited | Mark Andrews | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Formatting
|
| Jun 22, 2022 at 22:57 | comment | added | Zeruel017 | I think we can discuss a minimum even if we are dealing with possibilities | |
| Jun 22, 2022 at 21:43 | comment | added | J Kusin | > it is more likely an AI than to create a human brain, it already has the innate information and instructions, or an AI that starts with a very powerful learning algorithm, which maybe...is able to improve himself a lot and understand the universe very very well, despite being very dead? I'm just saying that weighing the odds of something we don't know for sure is possible or how likely it is against another thing that may or may not be possible (understanding while dead) makes any answer to your question as good as any other. | |
| Jun 22, 2022 at 21:18 | comment | added | Zeruel017 | I wrote this because I am concerned about this hypothesis, however, for you, what is the more likely hypothesis of the two I have described? | |
| Jun 22, 2022 at 20:02 | comment | added | J Kusin | Sure, that’s physically possible. Same like in universe v1.0 dinosaur scientist Dr. Bubblegum built a human simulator for their dinosaur buddies to play in. The question is, if you can leverage this kind of thought experiment into a useful scientific or philosophical action (present post notwithstanding). I’m dubious. | |
| Jun 22, 2022 at 19:12 | history | asked | Zeruel017 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |