Timeline for In what sense are proofs just arguments that convince us, not arguments that establish truth?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2014 at 6:46 | answer | added | Analogue girl | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 14, 2014 at 0:15 | answer | added | Paul Ross | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 13, 2014 at 16:51 | vote | accept | neddo | ||
| Jan 13, 2014 at 1:40 | comment | added | Baby Dragon | This might be of interest: ams.org/notices/200807/tx080700773p.pdf | |
| Jan 12, 2014 at 23:46 | comment | added | user5231 | Sounds logic but the whole sentence is an assumption not something that can be considered true or false. | |
| Jan 12, 2014 at 21:24 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhilosophy/status/422479307504902144 | ||
| Jan 12, 2014 at 16:44 | comment | added | labreuer | You might like my answer to "What is the difference between Fact and Truth?" | |
| Jan 12, 2014 at 13:47 | answer | added | Niel de Beaudrap | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jan 12, 2014 at 8:03 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 12, 2014 at 17:56 | |||||
| Jan 12, 2014 at 7:35 | history | asked | neddo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |