Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 17, 2014 at 18:20 vote accept Berecz_Fereng
Jan 17, 2014 at 16:26 comment added Chris Degnen @ shane - Basically, table, chairs, bodies and bones are material phenomena. Experience, memory, feeling and thought are from something that has transcended its materiality, and are transcendental phenomena.
Jan 17, 2014 at 16:19 comment added user5172 @ChrisDegnen I'm not sure I follow. But this isn't my area.
Jan 17, 2014 at 1:52 vote accept Berecz_Fereng
Jan 17, 2014 at 1:52
Jan 16, 2014 at 15:21 comment added Chris Degnen @ shane - Neither do I mean 'transcendental' in the esoteric or mystical sense. I mean transcendental as in "immanent in human existence", as in my 2nd quote on this question, from Ilan Gur-Ze’ev. However, I do mean transcendental as in not amongst the being of things, because "The thing doesn't at all transcend ..." - (from my 1st quote). That is precisely what the transcendent transcends.
Jan 16, 2014 at 14:45 comment added user5172 "transcendental" in this context isn't opposed to "material" or because it has to do with a different plane of existence or something (which is the way it is used in the phrase "transcendent God" or "transcendental meditation"). Rather, Husserl's philosophy is "transcendental" in the sense that it's concerned with the conditions of possibility that make an experience possible. This is a technical philosophical term with a slightly different sense. Husserl's phenomenology isn't supposed to be esoteric or mystical in any sense. It's about the real, concrete world we experience.
Jan 16, 2014 at 14:24 comment added Chris Degnen Sounds like Husserl's project is transcendental because it's dealing with the elevated plane of subjective perception; elevated because it is above mundane basic materiality. That is to say it is not transcendental because of what it does, but because of the plane it takes place in.
Jan 16, 2014 at 14:13 history answered user5172 CC BY-SA 3.0