Timeline for Basic truths as self-justified or parajustified
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2023 at 2:41 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 21, 2023 at 3:03 | |||||
| Mar 5, 2023 at 2:20 | comment | added | David Gudeman | Voting to close because requested details have not been provided. | |
| Mar 4, 2023 at 11:44 | answer | added | Kristian Berry | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 4, 2023 at 5:55 | comment | added | Conifold | Can you name foundationalists that talk about "self-justification"? Foundationalism generally just needs any non-inferentially justified beliefs, no matter how they are justified ("justified by nothing" cannot work because then anything goes). Alston's distinction between being justified and exhibiting justification specifically rules out "self-justifying" beliefs as properly basic, see IEP. The boundary between weak foundationalism and coherentism is not bright either, see BonJour's views under the same link. | |
| Mar 4, 2023 at 5:34 | comment | added | David Gudeman | Please provide some quotes of philosophers who claim that propositions are self-justified in a sense that could be called circular reasoning. I suspect you are drawing conclusions based on a misinterpretation of the terminology. | |
| Mar 4, 2023 at 3:41 | history | asked | user1113719 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |