I'm looking preferably for any survey articles on constructivism in the Philosophy of Mathematics - including Intuitionism in the tradition of Brouwer.

Hopefully such an article(s) will cover:

  1. Motivation (for mathematical and philosophical) for constructivism/intuitionism

  2. The main proponents of the view (including their differing stances) and a tracing of its development since Brouwer

  3. An exposition of the main components of constructivism/intuitionism in the context of the Philosophy of Mathematics

  4. Notable objections and substantiations of them

  5. Potential for future work, including modern reconstructions of the theory

Rather than a list of articles for each point - a lot of which I already have - I'm hoping someone can point me towards a full expository reference covering all of these thoughts.


| improve this question | | | | |
  • 2
    To get a modern idea I strongly recommend to read the introduction of the HoTT book: ncatlab.org/nlab/show/… – Urs Schreiber Mar 5 '14 at 15:34
  • I second the HoTT suggestion. Also if you can read Russian, there is an excellent survey by Albert Dragalin called Mathematical Intuitionism: Introduction to Proof Theory. – Hunan Rostomyan Mar 6 '14 at 18:40
  • 1
    @HunanRostomyan - there is an english translation published by American Mathematical Society in 1988. – Mauro ALLEGRANZA Mar 8 '14 at 15:37

Simply use SEP; see the entries on Intuitionism in the Philosophy of Mathematics and Constructive Mathematics.

Of course, if you want some book references, following @Paul Ross suggestion, I will add :

Errett Bishop, Foundations of constructive analysis (1967)

Errett Bishop & Douglas Bridges Constructive Analysis (1985)

Michael Beeson, Foundations of constructive mathematics (1985).

All of them deal with the "mathematical side" and not with the philosophical.

About this one, see :

Michael Dummett, Elements of Intuitionism (2nd ed, 2000).

| improve this answer | | | | |
  • The SEP article on Constructive Mathematics is written by Douglas Bridges, who is a very reputable source on the current state of the field. He's also given a good introductory lecture on the subject, with slides available at masfak.ni.ac.rs/cmfp2013/Nis%20lecture%20170113.pdf . – Paul Ross Mar 5 '14 at 15:31
  • @Mauro Many thanks - the SEP articles seem to be very thorough. – Mathmo Mar 29 '14 at 0:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.