1

Continuation of the question -> meta-thought, meta-imagined and/or even the non-thought, the non-imagined?

As we know, in spirituality, someone says that all and everything is not just possible, but already exist.

Ok...but now the problem is if there is some way to access it?

6
  • 3
    Welcome to Philosophy SE :) I had a hard time understanding your question because I don't know what you mean by all the terms, and I suspect all but a few specialists amongst us here would know them. I googled "hyperapproximatvely" and got a bunch of links for ADHD treatment :-P
    – Annika
    Nov 3, 2023 at 22:16
  • 2
    Reminds me of Ervin Lazlo and his Akashic Fields stuff. Interesting but not my cup of tea. Nov 3, 2023 at 22:34
  • No no, iperapprossimativamente è un termine che ho coniato io al momento...è per far capire qualcosadi veramente lontano da immaginare...è una specie di superiperbole.
    – Raffaele
    Nov 3, 2023 at 23:12
  • 2
    @Raffaele In particular, when coining new concepts it is necessary to introduce them by a definition which links them to known concepts. I do not know what a thing "veramente lontano da immaginare" could be. Please give an example.
    – Jo Wehler
    Nov 3, 2023 at 23:35
  • Jo Wehler ad esempio infinite entità infinitamente maggiori di infiniti onniversi onniplicati all'onni-infinito...
    – Raffaele
    Nov 4, 2023 at 11:37

0

Browse other questions tagged .